
cover
- Published: November 2025
- Pages: 574
- Tables: 104
- Figures: 120
The global microLED display market stands at a pivotal juncture in 2025, transitioning from prolonged research and development into early-stage commercialization after nearly two decades of technological refinement. Following Apple's high-profile cancellation of its microLED smartwatch project in 2024—which led to the dismantling of ams-Osram's dedicated Kulim 2 fab in Malaysia—the industry momentum is cautiously rebuilding with more realistic expectations and a clearer understanding of both opportunities and constraints.
The microLED ecosystem comprises approximately 120+ active companies spanning the complete value chain from epitaxial wafer growth through final system integration. Geographic concentration centers on Taiwan (35% of capacity) with the most vertically integrated ecosystem, China (40%) pursuing aggressive government-backed expansion, South Korea (15%) focusing on premium applications, and US/Europe (10%) driving innovation in novel architectures and AR/VR applications. The market exhibits two distinct technology trajectories: mass-transferred TFT-based large displays for television, automotive, and signage applications; and LED-on-Silicon (LEDoS) microdisplays targeting augmented reality headsets requiring extreme pixel densities exceeding 2,000 PPI.
After an extended proof-of-concept phase, 2025 marks the first meaningful production with three major high-volume fabs ramping operations: ENNOSTAR in Taiwan, HC SemiTek in Yangzhou, China, and Sanan Optoelectronics in Xiamen/Hubei. These represent the industry's first dedicated high-volume manufacturing facilities, signaling transition from laboratory demonstrations to commercial viability. Critically, AU Optronics' Gen 4.5 mass transfer line in Taiwan has achieved commercial production, delivering the Garmin fēnix 8 Pro MicroLED smartwatch—the first true commercial microLED wearable—and Sony-Honda's electric vehicle exterior display. Industry observers describe AUO's production line as a "make-or-break moment": success could validate manufacturing economics and trigger broader capacity investments; failure could relegate microLED to niche applications for years.
Large format displays currently represent the most mature commercial segment, with Samsung and LG selling premium microLED televisions ranging from 89 to 300+ inches at price points between $100,000 and $300,000. These modular displays leverage laser-based mass transfer technology and demonstrate microLED's superiority in brightness (>1,000 nits), contrast (>100,000:1), and lifetime. However, cost structures remain prohibitive for mass-market penetration, with die costs comprising 40-50% of bill-of-materials and current 15x30 to 20x40 µm chip sizes preventing the sub-10 µm dimensions required for consumer affordability.
Automotive applications show strong near-term potential, particularly for head-up displays where brightness requirements (>15,000 nits after optical losses) and safety-critical reliability justify premium pricing. The 2025 analysis identifies three HUD categories under development: panoramic HUDs (15-20° field of view), AR-HUDs enabling navigation overlay on actual roadways, and compact in-plane HUDs targeting mid-range vehicles at $400-600 system cost. Automotive qualification cycles extend 3-5 years, positioning 2027-2030 as the realistic adoption window.
Augmented reality represents microLED's most compelling long-term opportunity but faces fundamental physics challenges. Brightness emerges as the primary constraint: AR glasses require 50,000-100,000 nits at the microdisplay to deliver adequate visibility after 85% optical losses through projection systems and waveguides. While microLED alone achieves necessary brightness levels, efficiency at submicron emitter sizes remains insufficient, particularly for red wavelengths achieving only 1-3% external quantum efficiency versus the 5-8% required. Recent industry activity demonstrates commitment despite challenges: Mojo Vision raised $75 million (Series B-prime, led by Vanedge Capital) for its innovative 300mm GaN-on-silicon platform combining quantum dot color conversion, while GoerTek invested $100 million to acquire UK-based Plessey Semiconductors through subsidiary Haylo, securing access to Plessey's ultra-high-resolution AR microdisplay technology and recent Meta collaboration producing 6,000,000-nit red microLED displays.
Critical challenges constraining market expansion include: red LED efficiency degradation at small sizes (especially below 3 µm); mass transfer yields requiring >99.99% for consumer economics versus current 99.5-99.8%; absence of industry standardization multiplying non-recurring engineering costs; and CMOS backplane development costs ($5-20 million NRE) creating barriers for startups. The industry faces a fundamental conundrum: volume production capability is required to validate commercial legitimacy and drive cost reduction, yet premature investment risks equipment obsolescence as technologies continue evolving.
Supply chains are crystallizing with most leading display makers now controlling or aligned with microLED chip manufacturers. Startup funding increased 10-15% in 2025 versus 2024, though remaining below the 2023 peak, while fab investments proceed cautiously. Industry consensus suggests if current production lines demonstrate technical and economic success, additional capacity will emerge post-2027; conversely, if yields, costs, and manufacturability cannot improve substantially, AR/VR may remain the sole high-volume application alongside specialty B2B displays. The global market trajectory depends critically on the next 18-24 months as first-generation commercial products either validate or challenge the decade-long development investment.
The Global MicroLED Market 2026-2036 delivers authoritative analysis of the microLED ecosystem as it navigates critical technical challenges, manufacturing scale-up, and market adoption across diverse applications from premium televisions and automotive displays to augmented reality headsets and emerging data center optical interconnects.
The analysis encompasses the complete value chain from epitaxial wafer growth and chip fabrication through mass transfer equipment, backplane integration, display assembly, and system-level products. Application-specific analysis provides technical requirements, cost structures, adoption timelines, and market forecasts for consumer electronics (TVs, smartphones, wearables, laptops), automotive (HUD systems including panoramic, AR-HUD, and in-plane variants), AR/VR/MR (addressing the fundamental brightness constraint for near-eye displays), biomedical devices, transparent displays, and the potentially transformative optical interconnects for AI data centers. Each segment includes SWOT analysis, competitive dynamics, product developer profiles, and realistic commercialization pathways accounting for technical maturity and economic viability.
Manufacturing analysis details epitaxy and chip processing, competing mass transfer technologies (laser-based dominating large displays, stamp-based leading high-PPI panels, fluidic self-assembly facing uncertain prospects), backplane options (TFT for large format, CMOS for microdisplays), yield management and repair strategies, and color conversion approaches (RGB side-by-side versus quantum dot conversion). The report documents why multi-step transfer with chip-on-carrier has become the industry standard, analyzes equipment vendor dynamics as many pause microLED development awaiting customer commitments, and projects cost evolution roadmaps showing pathways to consumer price points.
Market forecasts project unit volumes and revenues by application through 2036, accounting for the bifurcation between mass-market consumer applications (conditional on solving cost and efficiency challenges) and high-value specialty segments (automotive HUDs, AR microdisplays, medical, B2B) where premium pricing justifies current economics.
Technical deep-dives examine die architecture evolution toward target sizes (submicron for AR, 10µm mid-term for large displays, 5µm long-term aspiration), external quantum efficiency status for blue/green/red emitters, system-level optimization recognizing backplane-LED co-dependencies, driving schemes (PWM versus PAM, TFT versus CMOS), light management, defect management strategies, and the critical search for viable red LED technology at small scales. The report synthesizes equipment landscape assessments, geographic manufacturing capacity analysis, and technology maturity matrices providing actionable intelligence for technology developers, equipment suppliers, display manufacturers, consumer electronics brands, automotive OEMs, investors, and strategic planning teams navigating this complex, high-stakes market.
Report Contents include:
- MiniLED and MicroLED market status and differentiation
- Global display market context (OLED, quantum dots, technology assessment)
- MicroLED benefits and value propositions
- Application landscape overview
- Market and technology challenges (die cost, system efficiency, mass transfer, yield management, standardization, application-specific barriers)
- Recent industry developments (2024-2025 transition, Apple cancellation impact, first commercial products, fab ramp-ups, investment patterns)
- Standardization deficit analysis and technology convergence status
- Global shipment forecasts to 2036 (units and revenues by market segment)
- Cost evolution roadmap and competitiveness timelines
- Competitive landscape assessment
- Technology trends and progress status
- Technology Introduction
- MicroLED definition, architecture, and operating principles
- MiniLED versus MicroLED comparison
- Display configurations and system architectures
- Development history and commercialization timeline
- Production technologies and integration approaches
- Mass transfer technologies overview
- Comparison to LCD, OLED, and quantum dot displays
- MicroLED specifications, advantages, and limitations
- Transparency, borderless, and flexibility capabilities
- Tiled display architectures
- Cost structures and die size relationships
- Manufacturing
- Manufacturing maturity spectrum and readiness assessment
- 2025 supply chain status (vertical integration, technology platforms, fab ramp-ups)
- Equipment development dynamics and vendor ecosystem
- Epitaxy and chip processing (materials, substrates, MOCVD, uniformity, RGB designs)
- Die size evolution and 2025 reality
- MicroLED performance characteristics (EQE, stability, size dependency, surface recombination)
- Transfer, assembly, and integration technologies (monolithic, heterogeneous wafers, GaN-on-silicon)
- Mass transfer methods detailed analysis (elastomer stamp, laser-enabled, electrostatic, fluidic self-assembly, pick-and-place)
- Mass transfer in 2025: technology convergence and persistent challenges
- Chip-on-carrier (CoC) as industry standard
- Transfer technology segmentation by application
- Equipment investment challenges and risks
- Yield management, testing, and repair strategies and equipment
- Manufacturing cost evolution and economic viability pathways
- Cost structure analysis for representative applications
- Die cost, transfer, testing, and total module cost reduction roadmaps
- Manufacturing readiness assessment and bottleneck analysis
- Process maturity matrix
- Geographic manufacturing landscape
- Defect Management
- Overview and critical importance
- Defect types and sources
- Redundancy techniques and architectures
- Repair technologies (laser micro-trimming, replacement strategies)
- Color Conversion Technologies
- Technology comparison and selection criteria
- Full color conversion approaches
- UV LED pumping
- Color filters
- Stacked RGB microLEDs
- Three-panel projectors
- Phosphor color conversion (materials, thermal stability, challenges)
- Quantum dot color conversion (operation modes, cadmium vs. cadmium-free, perovskite QDs, graphene QDs)
- QD display types and pixel patterning techniques
- Quantum wells
- Image quality optimization
- Light Management
- Overview and importance for efficiency
- Light capture methods and optical design
- Micro-catadioptric optical arrays
- Additive manufacturing for engineered emission profiles
- Backplanes and Driving
- Overview of backplane technologies
- TFT materials and OLED pixel driving heritage
- Passive versus active matrix addressing
- Pulse width modulation (PWM) and driving schemes
- Voltage considerations for microLEDs
- RGB driving schemes
- LTPS backplane integration
- Markets for MicroLEDs
- Consumer Electronic Displays:
- Market map and ecosystem players
- Market adoption roadmap and timeline
- Large flat panel displays and TVs (Samsung, LG products; 2025 manufacturing advances)
- Smartwatches and wearables (first commercial products, industry inflection point)
- Smartphones (OLED cost gap analysis)
- Laptops, monitors, and tablets (IT/productivity applications)
- Foldable and stretchable displays (global market, applications, product developers)
- SWOT analysis
- Biotech and Medical:
- Global medical display market
- Applications (implantable devices, lab-on-chip, endoscopy, surgical displays, phototherapy, biosensing, brain-machine interfaces)
- Product developers
- SWOT analysis
- Automotive:
- Global automotive display market
- Applications (cabin displays, head-up displays with detailed HUD categories analysis, exterior signaling and lighting)
- Current HUD limitations and alternative technology comparison
- HUD application categories (panoramic, AR-HUD, in-plane)
- Product developers
- SWOT analysis
- Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Mixed Reality (MR):
- Global VR/AR/MR market
- Brightness as main constraint for near-eye displays (critical 2025 analysis)
- Applications (AR/VR smart glasses and HMDs, microLED contact lenses)
- Products developers
- SWOT analysis
- Transparent Displays:
- Global transparent display market
- Applications (smart windows, display glass overlays)
- Market forecasts and technology adoption (2025)
- Product developers
- SWOT analysis
- Mirror Displays:
- Technology concept and construction
- Applications (automotive mirrors, smart home, retail, security)
- Optical Interconnects for Data Centers:
- Market context and opportunity for AI/HPC
- Technical requirements for optical interconnects
- MicroLED integration with silicon photonics
- Market potential and forecast
- Key technical challenges
- Competitive landscape
- Consumer Electronic Displays:
- Company Profiles: Detailed profiles including company background, technology approach, product portfolio, partnerships, manufacturing capabilities, and strategic positioning. Companies profiled include Aledia, ALLOS Semiconductors GmbH, Apple, AUO, Avicena, BOE Technology Group Co. Ltd., C Seed, CEA-Leti, Cellid Inc., ChipFoundation, eLux Inc., Enkris, Ennostar, EpiPix Ltd., Epileds Technologies, Focally, Foxconn Electronics, Fronics, HannStar Display Corp., HC SemiTek Corporation, Ingantec, Innolux Corporation, Innovation Semiconductor, Innovision, Jade Bird Display (JBD), Japan Display Inc. (JDI), Konka Group, Kopin Corporation, Kubos Semiconductors, LG Display Co. Ltd. and more......
Purchasers will receive the following:
- PDF report download/by email.
- Comprehensive Excel spreadsheet of all data.
- Mid-year Update
Payment methods: Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Paypal, Bank Transfer. To order by Bank Transfer (Invoice) select this option from the payment methods menu after adding to cart, or contact info@futuremarketsinc.com
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 29
- 1.1 The MiniLED market 30
- 1.2 The MicroLED market 31
- 1.3 The global display market 32
- 1.3.1 OLEDs 32
- 1.3.2 Quantum dots 33
- 1.3.3 Display technologies assessment 35
- 1.4 Benefits of MicroLEDs 37
- 1.5 Additive manufacturing for microLED micro-displays 38
- 1.6 MicroLEDs applications 38
- 1.7 Market and technology challenges 43
- 1.7.1 MicroLED Die Cost, Performance and Manufacturing Infrastructure 43
- 1.7.2 System-Level Efficiency and Backplane-LED Co-Optimization 43
- 1.7.3 Mass Transfer Equipment and Technologies 44
- 1.7.4 Yield Management Strategies and Equipment 44
- 1.7.5 Standardization Deficit 44
- 1.7.6 Application-Specific Challenges 44
- 1.8 Recent Industry developments 47
- 1.8.1 MicroLED Industry Developments 2025 47
- 1.8.2 CES 2025 MicroLED products and prototypes 49
- 1.8.3 The Watershed Year: 2024-2025 Transition 57
- 1.8.4 Apple's Project Cancellation and Immediate Aftermath (2024) 57
- 1.8.5 2025: The Beginning of Commercial Reality 58
- 1.8.5.1 First Commercial Products Enter Production 58
- 1.8.5.2 AUO's G4.5 Production Line 58
- 1.8.5.3 High-Volume MicroLED-Dedicated Chip Fabs Begin Ramping (2025) 59
- 1.8.6 Future Fab Investment Outlook 59
- 1.8.6.1 Investment Dynamics and the Industry Conundrum 59
- 1.8.7 Current Investment Patterns (2025) 60
- 1.8.7.1 Risk-Based Investment Hierarchy 60
- 1.8.7.2 Equipment Manufacturer Behaviour 61
- 1.8.8 Industry Maturity and Realistic Expectations 61
- 1.9 MicroLED Technology Trends 2024-2025 62
- 1.9.1 Red LED Breakthrough Wave 62
- 1.9.2 Mass Production Inflection Point 62
- 1.9.3 Quantum Dot Colour Conversion Dominance 63
- 1.9.4 Stacked RGB Architecture Emergence 65
- 1.9.5 Mass Transfer Technology Maturation 66
- 1.9.6 AR/VR Microdisplay Dominance 67
- 1.9.7 Automotive Display Expansion 69
- 1.9.8 Strategic Consolidation & Partnerships 71
- 1.9.9 Apple Watch Cancellation Impact 73
- 1.9.10 Flexible & Transparent Display Innovations 74
- 1.9.11 MicroIC & Novel Backplane Architectures 75
- 1.9.12 Inspection & Yield Management Focus 77
- 1.9.13 Wavelength-Specific Innovations 80
- 1.9.14 Large-Format Display Scale-Up 81
- 1.9.15 Alternative Materials & Novel Structures 82
- 1.9.15.1 Perovskite Quantum Dot LEDs (PQDs) 82
- 1.9.15.2 Colloidal Quantum Dots (CQDs) 83
- 1.9.15.3 Nanowire and Nanorod LEDs 84
- 1.9.15.4 Organic LEDs (OLEDs) - Microsized 84
- 1.9.15.5 Electroluminescent Quantum Dots (EL-QDs) 85
- 1.9.15.6 Monolithic Integration Architectures 85
- 1.9.15.7 Carbon Nanotube and 2D Material Approaches 86
- 1.10 Standardization Deficit and Technology Convergence (2025) 86
- 1.10.1 The Persistent Standardization Problem 86
- 1.10.2 Areas Lacking Standardization 87
- 1.10.2.1 Process Flow Architecture 87
- 1.10.2.2 When and Where to Perform Metrology, Testing, and Repair 87
- 1.10.2.3 Equipment Interfaces and Automation 87
- 1.10.2.4 LED Specifications and Binning 88
- 1.10.2.5 Colour Conversion and Full-Colour Architectures 88
- 1.10.3 The Costs of Non-Standardization 88
- 1.10.3.1 Multiplying Engineering Samples and NRE Costs 88
- 1.10.4 Stranded Asset Risk for Early Movers 89
- 1.10.5 Some Convergence Is Occurring 89
- 1.10.5.1 Multi-Step Transfer with Intermediate Carriers Now Dominant 89
- 1.10.6 Transfer Technology Segmentation by Application 90
- 1.10.7 LED Chip Manufacturing Approaching Maturity 90
- 1.10.8 Why Standardization Remains Elusive 90
- 1.10.8.1 The Path Forward: Collaborative Standardization Efforts Needed 91
- 1.11 Global shipment forecasts for MicroLEDs to 2036 93
- 1.11.1 Units by Market 93
- 1.11.2 Revenue by Market (Million USD) 95
- 1.12 Cost evolution roadmap 96
- 1.13 Competitive Landscape 98
- 1.14 Technology Trends 98
- 1.14.1 Progress on All Fronts, But More Is Needed 98
- 1.14.2 MicroLED Die Architecture and Size (2025 Status) 99
- 1.14.2.1 The Die Size Dilemma: Economic Reality vs. Technical Requirements 99
- 1.14.2.2 Die Cost as BOM Driver 99
- 1.14.2.3 Current Size Reality (2025) 99
- 1.14.2.4 Target Roadmap: The Size Reduction Challenge 100
- 1.14.2.4.1 Consumer Applications Requirement: <10 µm 100
- 1.14.2.4.2 Mid-Term Goal for Large Displays: 10 µm 100
- 1.14.2.4.3 Long-Term Aspirational Goal: ~5 µm 100
- 1.14.2.5 AR/LEDoS Target: Submicron Emitter Sizes 101
- 1.14.2.6 Why the Gap Persists: Technical Barriers to Size Reduction 101
- 1.15 MicroLED Efficiency and Display Power Consumption (2025 Status) 102
- 1.15.1 System-Level Efficiency: Beyond Individual LED Performance 102
- 1.15.2 2025 Industry Realization: Backplane and LED Co-Optimization Is Essential 103
- 1.15.2.1 Backplane Limitations Constraining LED Performance 103
- 1.15.3 LED Design Choices Affecting Backplane Requirements 104
- 1.15.4 High-Voltage LEDs and MicroLEDs: An Emerging Approach 104
- 1.15.4.1 Concept and Benefits 104
- 1.15.5 MicroLED EQE: 2025 Overview 105
- 1.15.5.1 Blue and Green LED Status 105
- 1.15.5.2 Red LED Challenge: The Persistent Problem 106
- 1.15.5.3 The Search for the Best Red Technology 107
- 1.15.5.4 Improving Internal Quantum Efficiency (IQE) 108
- 1.15.5.4.1 IQE Improvement Strategies in 2025 108
- 1.16 Manufacturing Infrastructure Status and Evolution 109
- 1.16.1 The Equipment Maturity Spectrum 109
- 1.16.1.1 Front-End (Epitaxy and Chip Manufacturing): Relatively Mature 109
- 1.16.1.2 Why Front-End is Less Risky 110
- 1.16.1.3 Mid-Stream (Mass Transfer and Assembly): High Uncertainty 110
- 1.16.1.4 Competing Transfer Approaches (2025 Status) 110
- 1.16.1.5 The Equipment Vendor Dilemma 111
- 1.16.1.6 Backplane and Module Assembly: Moderate Maturity 112
- 1.16.1 The Equipment Maturity Spectrum 109
- 1.17 Application Status and Commercial Reality (2025) 113
- 1.17.1 Overview: From Prototypes to Products 113
- 1.17.2 The Application Hierarchy 113
- 1.17.3 Smartwatches: The First Consumer Beachhead 114
- 1.17.3.1 Garmin fēnix 8 Pro MicroLED 114
- 1.17.3.2 Advantages for MicroLED in Smartwatches 115
- 1.17.3.3 Challenges Specific to Smartwatches 115
- 1.17.4 Automotive: Entering Premium EV Market 116
- 1.17.4.1 Why Automotive External Displays Are Interesting Entry Point 117
- 1.17.4.2 Automotive HUD Applications 117
- 1.17.4.3 Automotive Display Technology Comparison 118
- 1.17.4.4 Automotive Forecast 118
- 1.17.5 Consumer TV Panels 118
- 1.17.5.1 The TV Paradox: Perfect Application, Wrong Economics 118
- 1.17.5.2 Critical Cost Components Analysis 120
- 1.17.5.3 2025 Price Benchmark: LCD, OLED, Laser TV, and MicroLED 120
- 1.17.5.4 Technology Mapping for Large Displays 121
- 1.17.5.5 Strategic Implications 122
- 1.17.5.6 TV Price Bands and New Technology Adoption Dynamics 122
- 1.17.5.7 Risk Factors 123
- 1.17.6 Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Applications 124
- 1.17.6.1 The AR Brightness Challenge 124
- 1.17.6.2 LED-on-Silicon (LEDoS): The Optimal Architecture for AR 124
- 1.17.6.3 Advantages for AR Applications 125
- 1.17.6.4 Disadvantages/Challenges 125
- 1.17.6.5 Microdisplay Engines Comparison 126
- 1.17.6.6 Full-Colour Microdisplays: The Remaining Challenge 127
- 1.17.6.7 Companies Leading LEDoS Development 128
- 1.17.6.8 Strategic Ecosystem Developments 129
- 1.18 MicroLED Ecosystem 130
2 TECHNOLOGY INTRODUCTION 137
- 2.1 What are MicroLEDs? 137
- 2.2 MiniLED (mLED) vs MicroLED (µLED) 138
- 2.2.1 Display configurations 139
- 2.2.2 Development 140
- 2.2.2.1 Sony 140
- 2.2.3 Types 141
- 2.2.4 Production 142
- 2.2.4.1 Integration 142
- 2.2.4.2 Transfer technologies 143
- 2.2.5 Comparison to LCD, OLED AND QD 147
- 2.2.6 MicroLED display specifications 148
- 2.2.7 Commercially available MicroLED products and specifications 149
- 2.2.8 Advantages 150
- 2.2.8.1 Transparency 151
- 2.2.8.2 Borderless 155
- 2.2.8.3 Flexibility 156
- 2.2.9 Tiled microLED displays 157
- 2.2.10 Costs 157
- 2.2.10.1 Relationship between microLED cost and die size 157
3 MANUFACTURING 159
- 3.1 MicroLED Manufacturing Facilities 159
- 3.1.1 Geographic Distribution Summary 163
- 3.2 Manufacturing Maturity Spectrum 164
- 3.3 2025 Supply Chain Status 165
- 3.3.1 Vertical Integration and Strategic Alignment 165
- 3.3.2 Diverging Technology Platforms 166
- 3.3.3 Shared Fundamental Challenges 167
- 3.3.4 First High-Volume Fabs Ramping in 2025 167
- 3.3.5 Osram Exits Following Apple Cancellation 168
- 3.4 Equipment Development Dynamics 169
- 3.4.1 Equipment Vendor Dilemma 169
- 3.4.2 Current Equipment Development Status (2025) 170
- 3.4.3 Impact on Industry 171
- 3.4.4 Future Outlook 171
- 3.5 Epitaxy and Chip Processing 171
- 3.5.1 Materials 171
- 3.5.2 Substrates 173
- 3.5.2.1 Green gap 173
- 3.5.3 Wafer patterning 173
- 3.5.4 Metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) 174
- 3.5.5 Epitaxial growth requirement 175
- 3.5.6 Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) 175
- 3.5.7 Uniformity 175
- 3.5.8 Manufacturing Infrastructure Reality 176
- 3.5.8.1 Scale-Up to High-Volume Production 177
- 3.5.8.2 Uniformity Requirements for Small Die 177
- 3.5.8.3 Red LED Material Challenges Persist 177
- 3.5.8.4 Wafer Size Economics 178
- 3.5.8.5 Substrate Technology Evolution 178
- 3.6 Chip manufacturing 179
- 3.6.1 RGB microLED designs 180
- 3.6.2 Epi-film transfer 181
- 3.7 Die Size Evolution 182
- 3.7.1 Production Reality vs. Research Demonstrations 182
- 3.7.2 Why Smaller Die Are Essential Yet Elusive 182
- 3.7.3 Technical Challenges Creating Size Floor 183
- 3.7.4 Realistic Die Size Roadmap 184
- 3.8 MicroLED Performances 185
- 3.8.1 Relationship between external quantum efficiency (EQE) and current density 185
- 3.8.2 Stability and thermal management 185
- 3.8.3 Size dependency 186
- 3.8.4 Surface recombination of carriers 187
- 3.8.5 Developing efficient high-performance RGB microLEDs 187
- 3.9 Transfer, Assembly and Integration Technologies 189
- 3.9.1 Monolithic integration 190
- 3.9.1.1 Overview 190
- 3.9.1.2 Companies 191
- 3.9.2 Heterogeneous Wafers 191
- 3.9.2.1 Array integration 191
- 3.9.2.2 Wafer bonding 192
- 3.9.2.3 Hybridization integration 193
- 3.9.2.4 Companies 194
- 3.9.3 Monolithic microLED arrays 194
- 3.9.4 GaN on Silicon 195
- 3.9.4.1 Overview 195
- 3.9.4.2 Types 196
- 3.9.4.2.1 GaN on sapphire 197
- 3.9.4.3 Challenges 198
- 3.9.4.4 Companies 199
- 3.9.5 Mass transfer 199
- 3.9.5.1 Chiplet Mass Transfer 202
- 3.9.5.2 Elastomer Stamp Transfer (Fine pick and place) 203
- 3.9.5.2.1 Overview 203
- 3.9.5.2.2 Controlling kinetic adhesion forces 205
- 3.9.5.2.3 Pixel pitch 205
- 3.9.5.2.4 Micro-transfer printing 205
- 3.9.5.2.5 Capillary-assisted transfer printing 206
- 3.9.5.2.6 Electrostatic array 206
- 3.9.5.2.7 Companies 207
- 3.9.5.3 Roll-to-Roll or Roll-to-Panel Imprinting 207
- 3.9.5.4 Laser enabled transfer 208
- 3.9.5.4.1 Overview 208
- 3.9.5.4.1.1 Selective transfer by selective bonding-debonding 210
- 3.9.5.4.2 Companies 210
- 3.9.5.4.1 Overview 208
- 3.9.5.5 Electrostatic Transfer 212
- 3.9.5.6 Micro-transfer 212
- 3.9.5.6.1 Overview 212
- 3.9.5.6.2 Micro-Pick-and-Place Transfer 213
- 3.9.5.6.3 Photo-Polymer Mass Transfer 213
- 3.9.5.6.4 Companies 213
- 3.9.5.7 Micro vacuum-based transfer 214
- 3.9.5.8 Adhesive Stamp 214
- 3.9.5.9 Self-Assembly 214
- 3.9.5.9.1 Overview 214
- 3.9.5.9.2 Fluidically Self-Assembled (FSA) technology 215
- 3.9.5.9.3 Magnetically-assisted assembly 216
- 3.9.5.9.4 Photoelectrochemically driven fluidic-assembly 216
- 3.9.5.9.5 Electrophoretic fluidic-assembly 217
- 3.9.5.9.6 Surface energy fluidic-assembly 217
- 3.9.5.9.7 Shape-based self-assembly 217
- 3.9.5.9.8 Companies 218
- 3.9.5.10 All-In-One Transfer 218
- 3.9.5.10.1 Overview 218
- 3.9.5.10.2 Heterogeneous Wafers in All-in-One Integration 219
- 3.9.5.10.2.1 Optoelectronic Array Integration 219
- 3.9.5.10.2.2 Wafer Bonding Process and Hybridization 220
- 3.9.5.10.3 Companies 220
- 3.9.6 Nanowires 220
- 3.9.6.1 Overview 220
- 3.9.6.1.1 Nanowire Growth on Silicon 221
- 3.9.6.1.2 Native EL RGB nanowires 221
- 3.9.6.1.3 3D Integration 221
- 3.9.6.1 Overview 220
- 3.9.7 Bonding and interconnection 223
- 3.9.7.1 Overview 223
- 3.9.7.2 Types of bonding 223
- 3.9.7.3 Microtube Interconnections 224
- 3.9.1 Monolithic integration 190
- 3.10 Mass Transfer in 2025: Technology Convergence and Persistent Challenges 225
- 3.10.1 Multi-Step Transfer with CoC as Industry Standard 225
- 3.10.1.1 The CoC Process Architecture 225
- 3.10.1.2 Why CoC Dominates Despite Adding Complexity 226
- 3.10.1.3 Cost Analysis for 100" 4K TV Display 226
- 3.10.1.4 Implementation Challenges 228
- 3.10.2 Transfer Technology Segmentation by Application 228
- 3.10.2.1 Laser-Based Transfer: Dominant for Large Displays 228
- 3.10.2.2 Why Laser Dominates Large Displays 229
- 3.10.2.3 Limitations 229
- 3.10.3 Stamp-Based Transfer: Leading for High-PPI Small/Medium Displays 230
- 3.10.3.1 Why Stamps Lead High-PPI Applications 230
- 3.10.3.2 Limitations 230
- 3.10.3.3 2025 Status 231
- 3.10.4 Fluidic Self-Assembly (FSA): Status Uncertain 231
- 3.10.5 Pick-and-Place: Niche Role Only 233
- 3.10.6 Equipment Investment Challenges and Risks 234
- 3.10.1 Multi-Step Transfer with CoC as Industry Standard 225
- 3.11 Yield Management, Testing, and Repair 236
- 3.11.1 Overview: Why Yield Management Is Make-or-Break 236
- 3.11.2 Testing Strategies and Technologies 238
- 3.11.3 Advanced Testing Technologies (2025) 240
- 3.11.4 Repair Technologies and Strategies 241
- 3.11.5 Repair Equipment and Vendors (2025) 243
- 3.12 Manufacturing Cost Evolution and Economic Viability Pathways 244
- 3.12.1 Current Cost Structure Reality (2025) 244
- 3.12.1.1 Cost Structure Analysis: Representative Applications (2025) 244
- 3.12.2 Die Cost Reduction Pathways 246
- 3.12.2.1 Lever 1: Wafer Cost Reduction 246
- 3.12.2.2 Lever 2: Die Per Wafer (Geometric Efficiency) 248
- 3.12.2.3 Lever 3: Yield Improvement 249
- 3.12.2.4 Combined Die Cost Reduction Potential 250
- 3.12.3 Transfer and Assembly Cost Reduction 251
- 3.12.3.1 Cost Reduction Mechanisms 251
- 3.12.4 Testing and Repair Cost Evolution 252
- 3.12.5 Total Display Module Cost Evolution Roadmap 254
- 3.12.1 Current Cost Structure Reality (2025) 244
- 3.13 Manufacturing Readiness Assessment and Bottleneck Analysis (2025) 256
- 3.13.1 Process Maturity Matrix 256
- 3.13.2 Equipment Landscape and Vendor Ecosystem (2025) 258
- 3.13.2.1 Front-End Equipment (Mature Ecosystem) 258
- 3.13.2.2 Mid-Stream Equipment (Evolving, Moderate Maturity) 259
- 3.13.2.3 Back-End Equipment (Leveraging FPD Maturity) 260
- 3.13.2.4 Critical Equipment Gaps and Needs 260
- 3.13.2 Equipment Landscape and Vendor Ecosystem (2025) 258
- 3.13.3 Geographic Manufacturing Landscape 261
- 3.13.1 Process Maturity Matrix 256
4 DEFECT MANAGEMENT 264
- 4.1 Overview 264
- 4.2 Defect types 264
- 4.3 Redundancy techniques 264
- 4.4 Repair 265
- 4.4.1 Techniques 265
- 4.4.2 Laser micro trimming 265
5 COLOUR CONVERSION 267
- 5.1 Comparison of technologies 268
- 5.2 Full colour conversion 268
- 5.3 UV LED 270
- 5.4 Colour filters 270
- 5.5 Stacked RGB MicroLEDs 271
- 5.5.1 Companies 271
- 5.6 Three panel microLED projectors 272
- 5.7 Phosphor Colour Conversion 272
- 5.7.1 Overview 272
- 5.7.1.1 Red-emitting phosphor materials 274
- 5.7.1.2 Thermal stability 275
- 5.7.1.3 Narrow-band green phosphors 275
- 5.7.1.4 High performance organic phosphors 276
- 5.7.2 Challenges 276
- 5.7.3 Companies 277
- 5.7.1 Overview 272
- 5.8 Quantum dots colour conversion 277
- 5.8.1 Mode of operation 279
- 5.8.2 Cadmium QDs 280
- 5.8.3 Cadmium-free QDs 280
- 5.8.4 Perovskite quantum dots 281
- 5.8.5 Graphene quantum dots 284
- 5.8.6 Phosphors and quantum dots 286
- 5.8.7 Quantum dots in microLED displays 286
- 5.8.7.1 Technology overview 286
- 5.8.7.2 QD-based display types 287
- 5.8.7.3 Quantum dot colour conversion (QDCC) technology for microLEDs 288
- 5.8.7.4 Efficiency drop and red shift in quantum dot emission for displays 289
- 5.8.7.5 High blue absorptive quantum dot materials for display 289
- 5.8.7.6 QD display pixel patterning techniques 290
- 5.8.7.6.1 Inkjet printing 290
- 5.8.7.6.2 Photoresists 291
- 5.8.7.6.3 Aerosol Jet Printing 291
- 5.8.8 Challenges 291
- 5.8.9 Companies 292
- 5.9 Quantum wells 292
- 5.10 Improving image quality 293
6 LIGHT MANAGEMENT 295
- 6.1 Overview 295
- 6.2 Light capture methods 296
- 6.3 Micro-catadioptric optical array 297
- 6.4 Additive manufacturing (AM) for engineered directional emission profiles 297
7 BACKPLANES AND DRIVING 298
- 7.1 Overview 298
- 7.2 Technologies and materials 298
- 7.2.1 TFT materials 298
- 7.2.2 OLED Pixel Driving 299
- 7.2.3 TFT Backplane 299
- 7.2.4 Passive and active matrix addressing 300
- 7.2.4.1 Passive Matrix Addressing 300
- 7.2.4.2 Passive Driving Structure 300
- 7.2.4.3 Active Matrix Addressing 301
- 7.2.4.4 Pulse width modulation (PWM) 303
- 7.2.4.5 Driving voltage considerations for microLEDs 304
- 7.2.5 RGB Driving Schemes for MicroLED Displays 304
- 7.2.6 Active Matrix MicroLED Displays with LTPS Backplanes 305
8 MARKETS FOR MICROLEDS 307
- 8.1 CONSUMER ELECTRONIC DISPLAYS 307
- 8.1.1 Overview 307
- 8.1.2 Large flat panel displays and TVs 309
- 8.1.2.1 Samsung 310
- 8.1.2.2 LG 311
- 8.1.3 Technology and Manufacturing Advances (2025 Update) 312
- 8.1.3.1 Large Module Manufacturing Breakthrough 312
- 8.1.4 Smartwatches and Wearables 313
- 8.1.4.1 Industry Inflection Point: First Commercial Products (2025) 315
- 8.1.5 Smartphones 317
- 8.1.5.1 Economic Reality: The OLED Cost Gap (2025) 317
- 8.1.6 Laptops, monitors and tablets 320
- 8.1.7 Foldable and stretchable displays 322
- 8.1.7.1 The global foldable display market 324
- 8.1.7.2 Applications 327
- 8.1.7.2.1 Foldable TVs 327
- 8.1.7.2.2 Stretchable 12" microLED touch displays 327
- 8.1.7.2.3 Product developers 328
- 8.1.8 SWOT analysis 329
- 8.2 BIOTECH AND MEDICAL 331
- 8.2.1 The global medical display market 331
- 8.2.2 Applications 331
- 8.2.2.1 Implantable Devices 332
- 8.2.2.2 Lab-on-a-Chip 332
- 8.2.2.3 Endoscopy 333
- 8.2.2.4 Surgical Displays 333
- 8.2.2.5 Phototherapy 334
- 8.2.2.6 Biosensing 334
- 8.2.2.7 Brain Machine Interfaces 335
- 8.2.3 Product developers 335
- 8.2.4 SWOT analysis 336
- 8.3 AUTOMOTIVE 338
- 8.3.1 Global automotive displays market 338
- 8.3.2 Applications 339
- 8.3.2.1 Cabin Displays 342
- 8.3.2.2 Head-up displays (HUD) 342
- 8.3.2.2.1 Current HUD Limitations (Technical Detail) 343
- 8.3.2.2.2 Alternative Technologies - Limitations 343
- 8.3.2.2.3 HUD Application Categories 344
- 8.3.2.3 Exterior Signaling and Lighting 348
- 8.3.3 Product developers 349
- 8.3.4 SWOT analysis 350
- 8.4 VIRTUAL REALITY (VR), AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) AND MIXED REALITY (MR) 352
- 8.4.1 Global market for virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) 352
- 8.4.2 Brightness - The Main Constraint of Near-Eye Displays for AR (2025 Critical Analysis) 353
- 8.4.2.1 Why Brightness is Critical for AR 353
- 8.4.2.2 MicroLED - The Technical Solution 355
- 8.4.3 Applications 357
- 8.4.3.1 AR/VR Smart glasses and head-mounted displays (HMDs) 357
- 8.4.3.2 MicroLED contact lenses 358
- 8.4.4 Products developers 360
- 8.4.5 SWOT analysis 365
- 8.5 TRANSPARENT DISPLAYS 367
- 8.5.1 Global transparent displays market 367
- 8.5.2 Applications 367
- 8.5.2.1 Smart Windows 369
- 8.5.2.2 Display Glass Overlays 370
- 8.5.3 Market Forecasts and Technology Adoption (2025) 371
- 8.5.4 Product developers 373
- 8.5.5 SWOT analysis 374
- 8.6 MIRROR DISPLAYS 376
- 8.6.1 Technology Concept 376
- 8.6.2 Applications 376
- 8.7 OPTICAL INTERCONNECTS FOR DATA CENTERS 380
- 8.7.1 Market Context and Opportunity 380
- 8.7.2 Technical Requirements for Optical Interconnects 381
- 8.7.3 MicroLED Integration with Silicon Photonics 382
- 8.7.4 Market Potential and Forecast 383
- 8.7.5 Key Technical Challenges 384
- 8.7.6 Competitive Landscape 385
- 8.7.6.1 Alternative Technologies 385
9 COMPANY PROFILES 386 (89 company profiles)
10 REPORT AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 562
11 REFERENCES 563
List of Tables
- Table 1. Summary of display technologies. 36
- Table 2. Advantages of AM microLED micro-displays. 38
- Table 3. MicroLED applications. 38
- Table 4. Market and technology challenges for microLEDs. 45
- Table 5. MicroLED Industry Developments 2025 47
- Table 6. CES 2025 MicroLED products and prototypes. 49
- Table 7. Global MicroLED Display Market (Thousands of Units) 2024-2036, by Market 93
- Table 8. Global MicroLED Display Market Revenue (Million USD) 2024-2036, by Market 95
- Table 9. 100" Class 4K MicroLED TV Cost Breakdown (2025 Current State): 119
- Table 10. 130" Class 8K MicroLED TV Cost Breakdown (2025 Current State) 119
- Table 11. 65" Display Technology Price Comparison (2025 Consumer Pricing). 121
- Table 12. 85-100" Display Technology Price Comparison (2025 Consumer Pricing): 121
- Table 13. 120-150" Display Technology Price Comparison (2025): 121
- Table 14. Comparison of microdisplay technologies for AR applications 126
- Table 15. MicroLED Value Chain Ecosystem 130
- Table 16. LED size definitions. 137
- Table 17. Comparison between miniLED and microLED. 139
- Table 18. Comparison to conventional LEDs. 141
- Table 19. Types of MicroLED. 141
- Table 20. Summary of monolithic integration, monolithic hybrid integration (flip-chip/wafer bonding), and mass transfer technologies. 142
- Table 21. Summary of different mass transfer technologies. 144
- Table 22. MicroLED Comparison to LCD, OLED and QD. 147
- Table 23. Schematic comparison to LCD and OLED. 148
- Table 24. Commercially available MicroLED products and specifications. 149
- Table 25. Comparison of MicroLED with other display technologies. 150
- Table 26. MicroLED-based display advantages and disadvantages. 151
- Table 27. Companies Developing Transparent MicroLED Displays 152
- Table 28. MicroLED Manufacturing Facilities (2025) 159
- Table 29. Additional Facilities (Capacity Expansion/Future). 162
- Table 30. Materials for commercial LED chips. 172
- Table 31. Bandgap vs lattice constant for common III-V semiconductors used in LEDs. 173
- Table 32. Advantages and disadvantages of MOCVD. 174
- Table 33. Typical RGB microLED designs. 180
- Table 34. Size dependence of key parameters in microLEDs 186
- Table 35. Transfer, assembly and integration technologies. 189
- Table 36. Companies utilizing monolithic integration for MicroLEDs. 191
- Table 37. Advantages and disadvantages of heterogeneous wafers. 194
- Table 38. Key players in heterogeneous wafers. 194
- Table 39. Fabricating monolithic micro-displays. 195
- Table 40. GaN-on-Si applications. 196
- Table 41. Different epitaxial growth methods for GaN-on-Silicon. 196
- Table 42. Comparison of GaN growth on sapphire vs silicon substrates. 197
- Table 43. Cost comparison of sapphire versus silicon substrates for GaN epitaxy 197
- Table 44. Challenges of GaN-on-Silicon epitaxy and mitigation strategies. 198
- Table 45. Companies utilizing GaN microLEDs on silicon. 199
- Table 46. Mass transfer methods, by company. 200
- Table 47. Comparison of various mass transfer technologies. 200
- Table 48. Factors affecting transfer yield for microLED mass assembly. 202
- Table 49. Advantages and disadvantages of Elastomeric stamp for microLED mass transfer. 204
- Table 50. Companies utilizing elastomeric stamp transfer. 207
- Table 51. Laser beam requirement. 209
- Table 52. Companies utilizing laser-enabled transfer technology. 210
- Table 53. Companies developing micro-transfer printing technologies. 213
- Table 54. Types of self-assembly technologies. 214
- Table 55. Companies utilizing self-assembly. 218
- Table 56. Advantages and disadvantages of all-in-one CMOS driving technique. 219
- Table 57. Companies utilizing All-in-one transfer. 220
- Table 58. Comparison between 2D and 3D microLEDs. 222
- Table 59. Classification of key microLED bonding and interconnection techniques. 223
- Table 60. Types of bonding. 224
- Table 61. Application 1: 100" 4K TV Display Module 244
- Table 62. Premium Smartwatch Display (1.3", ~1M pixels) 245
- Table 63. Application 3: AR Microdisplay (0.5", LEDoS) 245
- Table 64. 100" 4K TV Display Module Cost Projection. 254
- Table 65. Strategies for full colour realization. 267
- Table 66. Comparison of colour conversion technologies for microLED displays. 268
- Table 67. Companies developing stacked RGB microLEDs. 271
- Table 68. Phosphor materials used for LED colour conversion. 272
- Table 69. Requirements for phosphors in LEDs. 273
- Table 70. Standard and emerging red-emitting phosphors. 274
- Table 71. Challenges with phosphor colour conversion. 277
- Table 72. Companies developing phosphors for MicroLEDs. 277
- Table 73. Comparative properties of conventional QDs and Perovskite QDs. 281
- Table 74. Properties of perovskite QLEDs comparative to OLED and QLED. 282
- Table 75. Perovskite-based QD producers. 283
- Table 76. Comparison between carbon quantum dots and graphene quantum dots. 284
- Table 77. Comparison of graphene QDs and semiconductor QDs. 285
- Table 78. Graphene quantum dots producers. 285
- Table 79. QDs vs phosphors. 286
- Table 80. QD-based display types. 287
- Table 81. Quantum dot (QD) patterning techniques. 290
- Table 82. Pros and cons of ink-jet printing for manufacturing displays. 291
- Table 83. Challenges with QD colour conversion. 291
- Table 84. Companies utilizing quantum dots in MicroLEDs. 292
- Table 85. Methods to capture light output. 296
- Table 86. Backplane and driving options for MicroLED displays. 298
- Table 87. Comparison between PM and AM addressing. 301
- Table 88. PAM vs PWM. 303
- Table 89. . Driving vs. EQE. 304
- Table 90. Comparison of LED TV technologies. 309
- Table 91. LG mini QNED range 311
- Table 92. MicroLED Smartwatches and Wearables by Company 314
- Table 93. MicroLED Smartphones by Company 318
- Table 94. MicroLED Laptops, Monitors, and Tablets by Company 321
- Table 95.MicroLED Flexible and Stretchable Displays by Company 325
- Table 96. Flexible, stretchable and foldable MicroLED products. 328
- Table 97. Medical display MicroLED products. 335
- Table 98. Automotive display & backlight architectures 338
- Table 99. Applications of MicroLED in automotive. 340
- Table 100. Automotive display MicroLED products. 349
- Table 101. Comparison of AR Display Light Engines. 353
- Table 102. MicroLED based smart glass products. 360
- Table 103. MicroLED transparent displays. 368
- Table 104. Companies developing MicroLED transparent displays. 373
List of Figures
- Figure 1. Blue GaN MicroLED arrays with 3um pixel pitch use polychromatic quantum dot integration to achieve full colour AR displays. 32
- Figure 2: QLED TV from Samsung. 34
- Figure 3. QD display products. 35
- Figure 4. The progress of display technology, from LCD to MicroLED. 37
- Figure 5. Head-up displays (HUD). 39
- Figure 6. Public advertising displays. 40
- Figure 7. Wearable biomedical devices. 41
- Figure 8. Pico-projectors. 42
- Figure 9. Global MicroLED Display Market (Thousands of Units) 2024-2036, by Market. 94
- Figure 10. MicroLED Cost Evolution Roadmap. 97
- Figure 11. MicroLED display panel structure. 138
- Figure 12. Display system configurations. 139
- Figure 13. MicroLED schematic. 140
- Figure 14. Pixels per inch roadmap of µ-LED displays from 2007 to 2019. 142
- Figure 15. Mass transfer for µLED chips. 143
- Figure 16. Schematic diagram of mass transfer technologies. 146
- Figure 17. Lextar 10.6 inch transparent MicroLED display. 152
- Figure 18. Transition to borderless design. 156
- Figure 19. Process for LED Manufacturing. 180
- Figure 20. Main application scenarios of microLED display and their characteristic display area and pixel density. 189
- Figure 21. Conventional process used to fabricate microLED microdisplay devices. 191
- Figure 22. Process flow of Silicon Display of Sharp. 192
- Figure 23. JDB monolithic hybrid integration microLED chip fabrication process. 193
- Figure 24. Monolithic microLED array. 195
- Figure 25. Schematics of a elastomer stamping, b electrostatic/electromagnetic transfer, c laser-assisted transfer and d fluid self-assembly. 201
- Figure 26. Transfer process flow. 204
- Figure 27. XCeleprint Automated micro-transfer printing machinery. 206
- Figure 28. Schematics of Roll-based mass transfer. 208
- Figure 29. Schematic of laser-induced forward transfer technology. 209
- Figure 30. Schematic of fluid self-assembly technology. 215
- Figure 31. Fabrication of microLED chip array. 216
- Figure 32. Schematic of colour conversion technology. 269
- Figure 33. Process flow of a full-colour micro display. 270
- Figure 34. GE inkjet-printed red phosphors. 275
- Figure 35. Toray's organic colour conversion film. 276
- Figure 36. Quantum dot schematic. 278
- Figure 37. Quantum dot size and colour. 279
- Figure 38. (a) Emission colour and wavelength of QDs corresponding to their sizes (b) InP QDs; (c) InP/ZnSe/ZnS core-shell QDs. 280
- Figure 39. A pQLED device structure. 281
- Figure 40. Perovskite quantum dots under UV light. 282
- Figure 41. Market adoption roadmap for microLED displays. 309
- Figure 42. Samsung Wall display system. 311
- Figure 43. Samsung Neo QLED 8K. 311
- Figure 44. MAGNIT MicroLED TV. 312
- Figure 45. MicroLED wearable display prototype. 314
- Figure 46. APHAEA Watch. 314
- Figure 47. AUO's 13.5-inch transparent RGB microLED display. 320
- Figure 48. AU Optonics Flexible MicroLED Display. 323
- Figure 49. Schematic of the TALT technique for wafer-level MicroLED transferring. 323
- Figure 50. 55” flexible AM panel. 324
- Figure 51. Foldable 4K C SEED M1. 327
- Figure 52. Stretchable 12" microLED touch displays. 328
- Figure 53. SWOT analysis: MicroLEDs in consumer electronics displays. 330
- Figure 54. MicroLEDs for medical applications 335
- Figure 55. SWOT analysis: MicroLEDs in biotech and medical. 337
- Figure 56. 2023 Cadillac Lyriq EV incorporating miniLED display. 339
- Figure 57. MicroLED automotive display. 339
- Figure 58. Issues in current commercial automotive HUD. 343
- Figure 59. Rear lamp utilizing flexible MicroLEDs. 349
- Figure 60. SWOT analysis: MicroLEDs in automotive. 351
- Figure 61. Lenovo AI Glasses V1. 353
- Figure 62. LAWK ONE. 358
- Figure 63. JioGlass. 358
- Figure 64. Mojo Vision smart contact lens with an embedded MicroLED display. 359
- Figure 65. Cellid AR glasses, Exploded version. 360
- Figure 66. Air Glass. 361
- Figure 67. Panasonic MeganeX. 362
- Figure 68. Thunderbird Smart Glasses Pioneer Edition. 362
- Figure 69. RayNeo X2. 363
- Figure 70. RayNeo X3. 363
- Figure 71. Tecno AI Glasses Pro. 364
- Figure 72. tooz technologies smart glasses. 364
- Figure 73. Vuzix MicroLED micro display Smart Glasses. 364
- Figure 74. Leopard demo glasses by WaveOptics. 364
- Figure 75. SWOT analysis: MicroLEDs in virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR). 366
- Figure 76. (a) Front of the AUO 17.3-inch dual-sided transparent microLED display and the (b) back of the display, with both on simultaneously.. 368
- Figure 77. Different transparent displays and transmittance limitations. 369
- Figure 78. 7.56" high transparency & frameless MicroLED display. 371
- Figure 79. 17.3-inch transparent microLED AI display in a Taiwan Ferry. 371
- Figure 80. SWOT analysis: MicroLEDs in transparent displays. 375
- Figure 81. WireLED in 12” Silicon Wafer. 387
- Figure 82. Typical GaN-on-Si LED structure. 388
- Figure 83. 300 mm GaN-on-silicon epiwafer. 389
- Figure 84. MicroLED chiplet architecture. 393
- Figure 85. Concept Apple Vr Ar Mixed Reality Headset. 393
- Figure 86. AUO 42-inch transparent microLED display. 396
- Figure 87. SeeThrµ Transparent MicroLED Display. 396
- Figure 88. Image obtained on a blue active-matrix WVGA (wide video graphics array) micro display. 402
- Figure 89. Fabrication of the 10-µm pixel pitch LED array on sapphire. 403
- Figure 90. A 200-mm wafer with CMOS active matrices for GaN 873 × 500-pixel micro display at 10-µm pitch. 403
- Figure 91. IntelliPix™ design for 0.26″ 1080p MicroLED display. 406
- Figure 92. C Seed 165-inch M1 MicroLED TV. 408
- Figure 93. N1 folding MicroLED TV. 408
- Figure 94. C Seed outdoor TV. 409
- Figure 95. Focally Universe AR glasses. 415
- Figure 96. HKC's display. 421
- Figure 97. Hongshi Intelligence full-colour microLED microdisplay. 422
- Figure 98. Jade Bird Display micro displays. 428
- Figure 99. JBD's 0.13-inch panel. 429
- Figure 100. Prototype MicroLED display. 431
- Figure 101. APHAEA MicroLED watch. 433
- Figure 102. KONKA 59" tiled microLED TV prototype screen. 434
- Figure 103. 12" 100 PPI full-colour stretchable microLED display. 452
- Figure 104. LGD stretchable microLED display. 453
- Figure 105. LG Magnit flight simulator concept model. 454
- Figure 106. Schematic of Micro Nitride chip architecture. 463
- Figure 107. 48 x 36 Passive Matrix MicroLED display. 476
- Figure 108. MicroLED micro display based on a native red InGaN LED. 478
- Figure 109. The Wall. 495
- Figure 110. Samsung Neo QLED 8K. 496
- Figure 111. NPQD™ Technology for MicroLEDs. 504
- Figure 112. Wicop technology. 506
- Figure 113. A micro-display with a stacked-RGB pixel array, where each pixel is an RGB-emitting stacked MicroLED device (left). The micro-display showing a video of fireworks at night, demonstrating the full-colour capability (right). N.B. Areas around the display/ 519
- Figure 114. TCL CSOT 219-inch panorama modular microLED display 524
- Figure 115. Photo-polymer mass transfer process. 525
- Figure 116. 7.56” Transparent Display 528
- Figure 117. 7.56" Flexible MicroLED. 530
- Figure 118. Visionox's 88-inch microLED modular display. 537
- Figure 119. Vuzix uLED display engine. 544
- Figure 120. Z100 smart glasses. 544
Purchasers will receive the following:
- PDF report download/by email.
- Comprehensive Excel spreadsheet of all data.
- Mid-year Update
Payment methods: Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Paypal, Bank Transfer. To order by Bank Transfer (Invoice) select this option from the payment methods menu after adding to cart, or contact info@futuremarketsinc.com