The Global Secondary Battery Materials Market 2026–2037

0

cover

  • Published: July 2026
  • Pages: 370
  • Tables: 44
  • Figures: 46

 

Secondary (rechargeable) battery materials are the engineered inputs that make up a lithium-ion cell and its surrounding module and pack — cathode and anode active materials, electrolyte, separator, conductive additives and binders, and the copper and aluminium current collectors, together with the busbars, insulation and structural housing that turn cells into a usable pack. Demand is driven overwhelmingly by the electrification of transport and the parallel build-out of stationary energy storage, with consumer electronics a smaller but stable third stream. As global lithium-ion output scales from roughly one terawatt-hour today toward several times that by 2037, material demand rises in step — though not uniformly, because chemistry mix, cell and pack architecture, and processing route all reshape which materials capture value.

The market is defined by a persistent tension between volume and value. High-volume commodities such as LFP cathode and graphite anode grow with capacity but carry thin margins, while smaller, specification-critical materials — silicon anode, carbon nanotubes, LiFSI salt, engineered separators — grow faster in percentage terms and command premium pricing. Cathode active materials remain the largest single value pool, anchored to volatile lithium, nickel and cobalt prices; anode is being reshaped by the gradual introduction of silicon; and separators, electrolytes and current collectors form steady, technically demanding mid-tier markets.

Two structural shifts run through the forecast period. First, pack-level engineering — cell-to-pack, cell-to-body and cell-to-chassis designs — is eroding module content while raising the importance of structural housing materials such as aluminium, high-strength steel and composites. Second, dry-electrode (solvent-free) processing is beginning to reshape binder and conductive-additive demand, favouring PTFE and carbon nanotubes over incumbent PVDF and carbon black.

Supply is acutely concentrated in China across nearly every segment, with nascent Western, Korean and Japanese capacity supported by the US Inflation Reduction Act, Section 45X and the EU Critical Raw Materials Act. Substitution risk — principally sodium-ion in cost-sensitive storage and entry EVs, and solid-state over the longer term — sits alongside recycling and critical-material recovery as swing factors for secondary supply. The result is a large, fast-growing but strategically contested market in which sourcing security, localisation economics and materials innovation increasingly determine competitive position through 2037, rewarding participants who can pair scale with defensible, specification-critical differentiation.

The Global Secondary Battery Materials Market 2026–2037 is a commercial market study of the full lithium-ion battery materials value chain, from cell active materials through to module and pack-structural components. It quantifies demand (in tonnes) and market value (in US dollars) for each in-scope material on a bottom-up basis — global cell output in gigawatt-hours, multiplied by chemistry- and architecture-specific material-intensity factors, then priced — with annual forecasts extended to 2037. The study covers eight value-chain segments: cathode active materials; anode active materials (graphite and silicon); electrolyte, salts and additives; separators; conductive additives and binders; current collectors; module materials; and pack-housing and structural materials. It also provides a dedicated analysis of dry-electrode (solvent-free) processing and its effect on the cell, binder and conductive-additive markets.

Beyond sizing, the report maps demand drivers and end-market splits across electric vehicles, stationary storage and consumer electronics; profiles the supplier landscape and geographic concentration for every segment; sets out pricing trends and cost structures; and assesses supply-chain risk against the US IRA/Section 45X and the EU Critical Raw Materials Act. A comparative-analysis chapter reconciles all segments into a single value-and-volume view with a regional breakdown, and a scenarios chapter tests sensitivity to chemistry mix, silicon loading, dry-process adoption, sodium-ion substitution and localisation. The study closes with a company-profiles directory spanning cathode, anode, electrolyte, separator, additive, binder, foil, upstream raw-material, cell, solid-state, sodium-ion and recycling players.

Contents summary: 

  • Executive summary — headline forecasts, material growth ranking and company landscape
  • Introduction, scope and methodology — the bottom-up GWh → intensity → tonnage → value model
  • Global Li-ion demand and the material-intensity model — demand by application, chemistry mix, end-market split
  • Cathode active materials — LFP, NMC, NCA, LMFP; lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese
  • Anode active materials — natural and synthetic graphite; silicon (SiOx, nano-Si, Si-C)
  • Electrolyte — salts (LiPF₆, LiFSI), solvents and additives
  • Separators — wet and dry base films; ceramic-coated
  • Conductive additives and binders — carbon black, CNT; PVDF, SBR/CMC
  • Current collectors — battery-grade copper and aluminium foil
  • Dry-electrode (solvent-free) processing — cell, binder and conductive-additive impact
  • Module materials — busbars, interconnects and insulation
  • Pack-housing and structural materials — aluminium, steel, composites; CTP/CTB/CTC
  • Comparative analysis, regional breakdown and supply-chain risk — including IRA/45X and EU CRMA policy
  • Scenarios and sensitivities — chemistry mix, silicon loading, dry-process, sodium-ion, localisation
  • Company profiles — 439 companies across the value chain
  • Appendices — methodology, full assumptions, demand-model tables, Excel sheet index, company directory and related FMI research

 

Companies profiled include 24M Technologies Inc., 2D Fab AB, 3DOM Inc., 6K Energy, AC Biode, Achelous Pure Metal Company Limited, Addionics, Advanced Solid-State Electrolyte Technology Co. Ltd. (ASET), Advano, AEGIS Critical Energy Defence Corp., AESC, AirMembrane Corporation, Albemarle, Allye Energy, Alsym Energy, Altairnano / Yinlong, Altech Batteries Ltd., Altris AB, AMO Greentech, Ampcera Inc., Amprius Inc., AMTE Power, Amtex, Anaphite Limited, Anhui Anwa New Energy, Anthro Energy, APB Corporation, Appear Inc., Arcadium Lithium, Argylium, Arkema, Asahi Kasei, Ateios Systems, Atlas Materials, Australian Advanced Materials, Avanti Battery Company, AZUL Energy Co. Ltd, BAK Power Battery, Base Power, BASF, Basquevolt, Bedimensional S.p.A, BeePlanet Factory, Beijing Easpring, Beijing WeLion New Energy Technology, Bemp Research Company, BenAn Energy Technology, BGT Materials Ltd., Bihar Batteries, Birla Carbon, Biwatt Power, Black Diamond Structures LLC, Blackstone Resources, Blue Current Inc., Blue Solutions, Blue Spark Technologies Inc., Bodi Inc., BrightVolt Inc., Broadbit Batteries Oy, Brunp (CATL), BTR New Energy Materials Inc., BTRY AG, BYD Energy Storage, Cabot Corporation, CALB, California Lithium Battery, CAMX Power, CAPCHEM, CarbonScape Ltd., CATL, CBAK Energy Technology Inc., CCL Design, CEC Science & Technology Co. Ltd, CellCube, CellsX, CENS Materials Ltd., Central Glass Co. Ltd., Ceylon Graphene Technologies (Pvt) Ltd, Cham Battery Technology, Chasm Advanced Materials Inc., Chemix, China Sodium-ion Times, Chongqing Tailan New Energy Co. Ltd., Cirba Solutions, Clim8, CMBlu Energy AG, Cnano Technology (LB Group), CNGR, Connexx Systems Corp, Conovate, Coreshell, Corporation Guangzhou Automobile New Energy (GAC), Customcells, Cymbet, Daejoo Electronic Materials, Daqus Energy, Denka, DFD, Do-Fluoride, Domolynx, Donut Lab Oy, Dotz Nano, Dreamweaver International, E-Magy, EBS Square, Ecellix, Echion Technologies, Eclipse, Ecobat, EcoPro BM, ElecJet, Electrified Thermal Solutions, Electroflow Technologies, Elegus Technologies, Emerald Battery Labs, Enchem, Energy Plug Technologies, Enevate, Enfucell Oy, ENGYCell, Enovix, EnPower Greentech, Ensurge Micropower ASA, Eonix Energy, Estes Energy Solutions, EticaAG, EVE Energy Co. Ltd, Exencell New Energy, Factorial Energy, Faradion Limited, Farasis Energy, FDK Corporation, Feon Energy Inc., FinDreams Battery Co. Ltd., FlexEnergy LLC, Forge Nano Inc., Forsee Power, Fortum, Front Edge Technology, Fuelium, Fuji Pigment Co. Ltd., Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., Furukawa Electric, Ganfeng Lithium, Ganfeng Recycling, GDI (Graphenix Development Inc.), Gelion Technologies Pty Ltd., GEM Co., General Motors (GM), Geyser Batteries Oy and more... 

 

 

 

 

1             EXECUTIVE SUMMARY            27

  • 1.1        Report scope and the questions it answers               27
  • 1.2        Headline market size and growth     27
  • 1.3        Key findings by value-chain segment             28
  • 1.4        Material growth ranking          29
  • 1.5        Company landscape at a glance      30

 

2             INTRODUCTION, SCOPE & METHODOLOGY           32

  • 2.1        Study objectives and scope 32
  • 2.2        Definitions and the boundary of the battery pack  33
  • 2.3        Bottom-up demand methodology    33
  • 2.4        Material-intensity framework (kg/kWh)        34
  • 2.5        Pricing, data sources and assumptions      35
  • 2.6        Limitations and confidence flags     36

 

3             GLOBAL LI-ION DEMAND & THE MATERIAL-INTENSITY MODEL   37

  • 3.1        Global Li-ion demand by application             37
  • 3.2        Cathode chemistry-mix evolution    38
  • 3.3        Regional production of cells 40
  • 3.4        From GWh to material demand         40
  • 3.5        From demand to market value           41
  • 3.6        End-market split (EV, ESS, consumer, other)             42

 

4             CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIALS           43

  • 4.1        Overview and role in the cell                43
  • 4.2        Chemistry landscape (LFP, NMC, NCA, LMFP)        44
  • 4.3        Demand outlook by chemistry           45
  • 4.4        Critical raw material — lithium          46
  • 4.5        Critical raw material — nickel             47
  • 4.6        Critical raw materials — cobalt & manganese        47
  • 4.7        Supply landscape and geographic concentration  48
  • 4.8        Pricing and cost structure      49
  • 4.9        Technology & substitution (LMFP, sodium-ion)       50
  • 4.10     Outlook             51

 

5             ANODE ACTIVE MATERIALS 53

  • 5.1        Overview and role       53
  • 5.2        Graphite — natural vs synthetic         53
  • 5.3        Silicon anode materials (SiOx, nano-Si, Si-C)          55
  • 5.4        Silicon loading roadmap and the 2028–2030 inflection    56
  • 5.5        Demand outlook         57
  • 5.6        Supply landscape       57
  • 5.7        Pricing and cost structure      58
  • 5.8        Technology & substitution    59
  • 5.9        Outlook             60

 

6             ELECTROLYTE               61

  • 6.1        Overview and function            61
  • 6.2        Salts (LiPF₆, LiFSI)       61
  • 6.3        Solvents (EC, DMC, EMC, DEC, PC) 62
  • 6.4        Additives (VC, FEC)    63
  • 6.5        Demand outlook         64
  • 6.6        Supply landscape and pricing            65
  • 6.7        Outlook             65

 

7             SEPARATORS 66

  • 7.1        Overview and function            66
  • 7.2        Wet vs dry-process base films           66
  • 7.3        Ceramic-coated separators 67
  • 7.4        Demand outlook         69
  • 7.5        Supply landscape       70
  • 7.6        Pricing and cost structure      71
  • 7.7        Outlook             72

 

8             CONDUCTIVE ADDITIVES AND BINDERS    73

  • 8.1        Overview and function            73
  • 8.2        Conductive additives — carbon black          73
  • 8.3        Conductive additives — CNT / SWCNT         74
  • 8.4        Binders — PVDF           76
  • 8.5        Binders — SBR / CMC              76
  • 8.6        Demand outlook         78
  • 8.7        Supply, pricing and FMI view                79

 

9             CURRENT COLLECTORS        81

  • 9.1        Overview and function            81
  • 9.2        Battery-grade copper foil       81
  • 9.3        Battery-grade aluminium foil              82
  • 9.4        Foil-thickness trends and material efficiency           83
  • 9.5        Demand outlook         85
  • 9.6        Supply landscape and pricing            86
  • 9.7        Outlook             87

 

10          DRY-ELECTRODE (SOLVENT-FREE PROCESSING) 88

  • 10.1     Dry-electrode processing      88
  • 10.2     Cell market and dry-process adoption         89
  • 10.3     Impact on the binder market               90
  • 10.4     Impact on the conductive-additives market              91
  • 10.5     Cost, capex and qualification barriers          92
  • 10.6     Outlook             93

 

11          MODULE MATERIALS                94

  • 11.1     Overview — module vs cell-to-pack                94
  • 11.2     Busbars and interconnects (Cu, Al) 94
  • 11.3     Module insulation & dielectric films               95
  • 11.4     Demand outlook (major-material level)        96
  • 11.5     Supply and pricing      98

 

12          PACK-HOUSING & STRUCTURAL MATERIALS          99

  • 12.1     Overview — the enclosure's structural role               99
  • 12.2     Aluminium (extruded & die-cast)      100
  • 12.3     High-strength steel     101
  • 12.4     Structural composites (SMC/GFRP, CFRP) 101
  • 12.5     Structural pack integration (CTP/CTB/CTC)               103
  • 12.6     Demand outlook (major-material level)        104
  • 12.7     Outlook             105

 

13          COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS, REGIONAL BREAKDOWN & SUPPLY-CHAIN RISK      106

  • 13.1     Cross-material forecast comparison             106
  • 13.2     Value-vs-volume divergence                107
  • 13.3     Regional demand & value breakdown           107
  • 13.4     Supply-chain concentration 108
  • 13.5     Critical-material supply risk 109
  • 13.6     Policy landscape (US IRA / 45X, EU CRMA) 110
  • 13.7     Localisation outlook 111

 

14          SCENARIOS & SENSITIVITIES              112

  • 14.1     Scenario framework  112
  • 14.2     Chemistry-mix sensitivity      113
  • 14.3     Silicon-loading sensitivity      114
  • 14.4     Dry-process adoption sensitivity      115
  • 14.5     Sodium-ion substitution sensitivity 116
  • 14.6     Localisation sensitivity            116
  • 14.7     Combined scenario outcomes          117
  •  

15          COMPANY PROFILES                119

  • 15.1     Cathode active materials      119 (45 company profiles)
  • 15.2     Anode — graphite & carbon 144 (23 company profiles)
  • 15.3     Anode — silicon           158 (29 company profiles)
  • 15.4     Electrolyte, salts & additives               173 (22 company profiles)
  • 15.5     Separators       185 (18 company profiles)
  • 15.6     Conductive additives (CNT, graphene, carbon black)         195 (38 company profiles)
  • 15.7     Binders              215 (9 company profiles)
  • 15.8     Current collectors (foils)        220 (12 company profiles)
  • 15.9     Upstream raw & critical materials    226 (15 company profiles)
  • 15.10  Li-ion cell & pack manufacturers     234 (51 company profiles)
  • 15.11  Solid-state, Li-metal & Li-S   262 (51 company profiles)
  • 15.12  Sodium-ion materials & cells              289 (24 company profiles)
  • 15.13  Recycling & material recovery             302 (14 company profiles)
  • 15.14  Additional advanced-battery & materials developers         309 (94 company profiles)

 

16          APPENDICES  360

  • 16.1     Methodology detail & full assumption set  360
  • 16.2     Demand-model tables (full annual series to 2037)              361
  • 16.3     Glossary & abbreviations       362

 

17          REFERENCES 364

 

List of Tables

  • Table 1. Headline forecast summary — value, volume and CAGR by segment  27
  • Table 2. Leading suppliers by value-chain segment             30
  • Table 3. In-scope value-chain segments and materials     32
  • Table 4. Material-intensity assumptions by chemistry (kg/kWh)  34
  • Table 5. Principal data sources and vintage               35
  • Table 6. Li-ion demand by application (GWh), 2026–2037              38
  • Table 7. Chemistry mix by year           39
  • Table 8. Aggregate material demand (kt) by segment          40
  • Table 9. Aggregate material market value (US$bn) by segment    41
  • Table 10. Cathode chemistry technical comparison           44
  • Table 11. Cathode demand and value by chemistry, 2026–2037 45
  • Table 12. Nickel content and demand by chemistry            47
  • Table 13. Cathode price assumptions by chemistry (US$/kg)       50
  • Table 14. Natural vs synthetic graphite comparison            54
  • Table 15. Anode material technical comparison    55
  • Table 16. Anode demand and value by type               57
  • Table 17. Anode price assumptions (US$/kg)          58
  • Table 18. Electrolyte salt comparison           61
  • Table 19. Solvent mix and function  62
  • Table 20. Electrolyte demand and value, 2026–2037          64
  • Table 21. Wet vs dry separator comparison               66
  • Table 22. Separator demand (m², kt) and value       69
  • Table 23. Separator price assumptions (US$/m²)  71
  • Table 24. Conductive-additive comparison               74
  • Table 25. Binder-system comparison            77
  • Table 26. Additive & binder demand and value        78
  • Table 27. Cu vs Al foil specifications              82
  • Table 28. Current-collector demand and value       85
  • Table 29. Cell market and dry-process share, 2026–2037               89
  • Table 30. Binder market by type (incl. PTFE) with growth  90
  • Table 31. Busbar material demand (kt)         94
  • Table 32. Insulation material types  95
  • Table 33. Module material demand and value         97
  • Table 34. Aluminium enclosure demand (kt)            100
  • Table 35. Structural-material comparison  102
  • Table 36. Pack-structural material demand and value       104
  • Table 37. All segments — value, volume and CAGR, 2026–2037 106
  • Table 38. Material value by region, 2026–2037        107
  • Table 39. Supply-chain risk matrix by material        109
  • Table 40. Key policies affecting material localisation          110
  • Table 41. Scenario definitions (base, high, low)      112
  • Table 42. Market value by scenario, 2037   117
  • Table 43. Full material-intensity assumption set    360
  • Table 44. Full demand model, 2026–2037 361
  •  

List of Figures

  • Figure 1. Total in-scope material market — value and volume, 2026–2037          27
  • Figure 2. Material market value by segment, 2026 vs 2037             28
  • Figure 3. Segment CAGR vs 2037 market size (bubble)      29
  • Figure 4. Anatomy of a Li-ion cell, module and pack           33
  • Figure 5. Model architecture: GWh → material intensity → tonnage → value           33
  • Figure 6. Li-ion cell output (GWh) by application, 2026–2037       37
  • Figure 7. Cathode chemistry mix (% of GWh), 2026–2037               38
  • Figure 8. Cell output by region            40
  • Figure 9. Material demand by end-market   42
  • Figure 10. Cell energy density by cathode chemistry           44
  • Figure 11. Cathode active-material demand (kt) by chemistry      45
  • Figure 12. Lithium demand and price outlook          46
  • Figure 13. Cathode precursor / CAM capacity by region    49
  • Figure 14. Cathode market value forecast, 2026–2037     49
  • Figure 15. Graphite demand (kt) — natural vs synthetic    54
  • Figure 16. Reversible specific capacity of anode materials             55
  • Figure 17. Average silicon-loading scenarios, 2026–2037 56
  • Figure 18. Graphite / anode capacity by region        57
  • Figure 19. LiPF₆ vs LiFSI demand, 2026–2037          62
  • Figure 20. Electrolyte market value forecast             64
  • Figure 21. Electrolyte capacity by region     65
  • Figure 22. Separator area demand (m²) and coated share               68
  • Figure 23. Separator capacity by region       70
  • Figure 24. Conductive-additive market by type        75
  • Figure 25. Binder market by type, 2026–2037          79
  • Figure 26. Additive / binder value forecast  79
  • Figure 27. Copper-foil demand (kt), 2026–2037     82
  • Figure 28. Foil-thickness roadmap  84
  • Figure 29. Foil capacity by region      86
  • Figure 30. Wet vs dry electrode process flow           88
  • Figure 31. Dry-process share of cell output               89
  • Figure 32. Binder-mix shift (PVDF → PTFE)   90
  • Figure 33. Additive loading — wet vs dry      91
  • Figure 34. Module-content trend under CTP / CTB                94
  • Figure 35. Module material value, 2026–2037         97
  • Figure 36. Pack enclosure architecture (tray, cover, cross-members)      99
  • Figure 37. Material split of the enclosure by architecture 103
  • Figure 38. Pack-structural market value, 2026–2037          104
  • Figure 39. Material market value stack, 2026–2037             106
  • Figure 40. Value vs volume growth by segment       107
  • Figure 41. Regional share of material value               107
  • Figure 42. Geographic concentration (HHI) by segment    108
  • Figure 43. Cathode demand under chemistry scenarios  113
  • Figure 44. Anode value under silicon scenarios      114
  • Figure 45. Binder / additive mix under dry-process scenarios       115
  • Figure 46. LFP volume under sodium-ion scenarios            116

 

 

 

 

 

The Global Secondary Battery Materials Market 2026–2037
The Global Secondary Battery Materials Market 2026–2037
PDF + Excel Database download.

The Global Secondary Battery Materials Market 2026–2037
The Global Secondary Battery Materials Market 2026–2037
PDF + Excel Database + Print Edition (including tracked delivery).

 

Payment methods: Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Bank Transfer. To order by Bank Transfer (Invoice) select this option from the payment methods menu after adding to cart, or contact info@futuremarketsinc.com