The Global Sustainable Packaging Materials Market 2026-2036

0

cover

cover

  • Published: July 2025
  • Pages: 655
  • Tables: 107
  • Figures: 135

 

The global sustainable packaging materials market represents one of the fastest-growing segments within the broader packaging industry, driven by mounting environmental concerns, stringent regulatory frameworks, and evolving consumer preferences toward eco-friendly products. This dynamic market encompasses biodegradable and compostable materials, recycled content packaging, bio-based plastics, and innovative barrier coatings designed to minimize environmental impact while maintaining essential protective functions. The sustainable packaging materials market has experienced robust growth, with global consumption reaching significant volumes across multiple material categories. Paper and board packaging dominates the market by volume, leveraging recycled content and forest-certified virgin fibers to meet sustainability criteria. Bio-based plastics, including PLA (polylactic acid), PHA (polyhydroxyalkanoates), and bio-PE variants, represent the fastest-growing segment, though from a smaller base. The market spans diverse packaging formats, from flexible films and rigid containers to specialized barrier coatings and sustainable adhesive systems.

Revenue projections through 2035 indicate sustained double-digit growth rates, particularly in premium segments such as compostable food packaging and advanced bio-based barrier materials. The Asia-Pacific region leads market expansion, driven by increasing production capacities for bio-based materials and growing environmental awareness among consumers and manufacturers. The market's evolution is characterized by significant technological breakthroughs across multiple material categories. Cellulose-based innovations, including microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) and nanocellulose applications, are revolutionizing barrier properties while maintaining biodegradability. Seaweed-based packaging materials are emerging as promising alternatives, offering marine biodegradability and renewable feedstock advantages.

Advanced recycling technologies, including chemical recycling processes such as pyrolysis, gasification, and depolymerization, are expanding the scope of recyclable materials. These technologies enable closed-loop systems for previously non-recyclable packaging formats, particularly multilayer flexible packaging structures. Sustainable adhesive technologies represent a critical but often overlooked component, with waterborne, bio-based hot melt, and natural polymer adhesive systems gaining traction. These developments address recyclability challenges while maintaining performance standards required for food safety and product protection.

The regulatory landscape significantly influences market dynamics, with the EU's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) and Single Use Plastics Directive (SUPD) establishing ambitious targets for recyclability and bio-based content. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes across multiple regions create economic incentives for sustainable packaging adoption through fee structures that penalize non-recyclable materials while rewarding sustainable alternatives. PFAS restrictions in food contact applications are accelerating development of alternative barrier technologies, including mineral-based coatings, natural waxes, and bio-based polymer barriers. These regulatory pressures create both challenges and opportunities, forcing innovation while establishing clear market advantages for compliant solutions.

Food packaging applications dominate market demand, accounting for the largest share across most sustainable material categories. Fresh food packaging drives adoption of compostable materials and bio-based barriers, while processed food applications focus on recyclable mono-material structures and enhanced barrier performance from sustainable sources. Beverage packaging represents a high-value segment, with bio-based PET bottles and advanced paper-based solutions gaining market share. E-commerce packaging growth creates opportunities for molded fiber solutions, biodegradable protective materials, and optimized shipping formats that reduce material usage.

Market growth faces several challenges, including cost competitiveness relative to conventional materials, scalability of bio-based feedstock supplies, and infrastructure development for composting and advanced recycling. Performance gaps in barrier properties and shelf-life extension remain obstacles for certain applications, though continuous innovation is narrowing these differences. The circular economy transition drives demand for mono-material packaging designs, recyclable barrier coatings, and standardized material streams that enhance recovery efficiency. Brand owner commitments and consumer willingness to pay premiums for sustainable packaging create favourable market conditions for continued expansion.

The Global Sustainable Packaging Materials Market 2026-2036 represents the definitive industry intelligence resource for stakeholders navigating the transformative shift toward environmentally responsible packaging solutions. This comprehensive 650+ page market analysis delivers critical insights into biodegradable materials, bio-based plastics, sustainable barrier coatings, packaging adhesives, and advanced recycling technologies that are revolutionizing the global packaging landscape through 2036.

As regulatory frameworks like the EU's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) and Single Use Plastics Directive (SUPD) drive unprecedented market transformation, this strategic report provides essential market sizing, competitive intelligence, and technology roadmaps for manufacturers, brand owners, investors, and policymakers. The analysis encompasses emerging innovations including cellulose nanofibers, seaweed-based materials, mushroom packaging, PHA bioplastics, chemical recycling processes, and sustainable adhesive systems reshaping packaging applications across food, beverage, flexible, and rigid packaging segments.

The report delivers granular market forecasts spanning 2026-2036 with detailed regional analysis covering North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa markets. Technology adoption patterns, production capacity developments, and regulatory compliance strategies are examined across multiple packaging formats, providing actionable intelligence for strategic decision-making in this rapidly evolving market environment.

Report contents include: 

  • Global sustainable packaging market sizing and growth projections 2026-2036 by material type, application, and region
  • Market segmentation analysis: biodegradable materials, bio-based plastics, recycled content, barrier coatings, adhesives
  • Competitive landscape evaluation and market share distribution among leading industry players
  • Key performance indicators and technology adoption metrics across packaging applications
  • Regulatory impact assessment and compliance framework analysis
  • Sustainable Materials Technology Analysis:
    • Biodegradable and compostable materials: PLA, PHA, starch blends, bagasse, mushroom packaging innovations
    • Bio-based plastics comprehensive analysis: Bio-PE, Bio-PET, Bio-PP, Bio-PTT, Bio-PEF, Bio-PBAT technologies
    • Paper and fiber-based solutions: recycled content strategies, FSC certification, alternative fiber sources
    • Cellulose innovations: microfibrillated cellulose (MFC), nanocellulose applications, bacterial nanocellulose
    • Advanced materials: seaweed packaging, mycelium solutions, chitosan applications, protein-based bioplastics
    • Edible packaging technologies and algae-based material developments
  • Sustainable Barrier Coatings Market Analysis:
    • Thermoplastic polymer coatings: polyethylene, polypropylene applications and sustainability profiles
    • High barrier polymer solutions: Green PVOH/EVOH technologies and performance characteristics
    • Alternative barrier technologies: aluminium coatings, wax systems, silicone applications
    • Bio-based barrier polymers: PHA coatings, starch-based barriers, protein-based materials
    • Application processes: extrusion coatings, wet-barrier applications, metallization techniques
    • Substrate compatibility: paper vs. plastic applications and performance optimization
  • Packaging Adhesives Technology:
    • Waterborne adhesive systems: acrylic-copolymer, VAE, PVAc, and natural-based formulations
    • Solvent-borne and reactive systems: acrylic, synthetic elastomer, polyurethane technologies
    • Hot melt adhesive innovations: EVA, polyolefin, bio-based formulations, polyamide systems
    • Radiation-curable technologies: UV-curable and electron beam systems
    • Performance requirements: bond strength, temperature resistance, food contact compliance
    • Sustainable development trends and recycling-compatible formulations
  • Advanced Chemical Recycling Technologies:
    • Mechanical recycling processes: closed-loop and open-loop systems, polymer recovery analysis
    • Chemical recycling comprehensive assessment: pyrolysis, gasification, dissolution, depolymerization
    • Technology deep-dive: catalytic and non-catalytic processes, SWOT analysis by technology type
    • Advanced processes: hydrolysis, enzymolysis, methanolysis, glycolysis, aminolysis techniques
    • Emerging technologies: hydrothermal cracking, plasma technologies, supercritical fluid applications
    • Commercial capacity analysis and production facility mapping
  • Market Applications & End-Use Analysis:
    • Paper and board packaging: recycled content, certified fibers, barrier papers, water-based coatings
    • Food packaging applications: compostable containers, biodegradable films, bio-based barriers
    • Flexible packaging innovations: mono-material designs, paper-based solutions, reduced material structures
    • Rigid packaging developments: recycled plastic containers, bio-based alternatives, refillable systems
    • Carbon capture derived materials: CO₂ utilization pathways and commercial applications
  • Regional Market Intelligence & Forecasts:
    • Europe: PPWR compliance strategies, SUPD implementation, EPR scheme analysis, market sizing
    • North America: regulatory landscape, production facilities, brand initiatives, growth projections
    • Asia-Pacific: manufacturing capabilities, bio-material production hubs, emerging opportunities
    • Latin America: bio-PE production centers, agricultural waste utilization, regional dynamics
    • Middle East & Africa: market development potential, resource availability, investment landscape
  • Regulatory Framework & Compliance Analysis:
    • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) impact assessment and compliance requirements
    • Single Use Plastics Directive (SUPD) implementation and market implications
    • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes and fee structure analysis across global markets
    • PFAS restrictions and alternative technology development pathways
    • Certification standards: compostability, recyclability, bio-based content verification protocols
  • Market Forecasts Through 2036:
    • Volume and value projections by material category, application segment, and geographic region
    • Price trend analysis and cost competitiveness evaluation versus conventional packaging materials
    • Supply chain intelligence: raw material availability, production capacity expansion, distribution networks
    • Investment landscape assessment: venture capital trends, strategic partnerships, M&A activity
    • Technology commercialization timelines and market penetration forecasts
  • Company Profiles: This comprehensive market intelligence report features detailed strategic profiles of over 310 leading companies driving innovation across the sustainable packaging materials value chain: 9Fiber Inc., Acorn Pulp Group, Actega, ADBioplastics, Advanced Biochemical Thailand, Advanced Paper Forming LLC, Aeropowder Limited, AGRANA Staerke GmbH, Agrosustain SA, Ahlstrom-Munksjö Oyj, AIM Sweden AB, Akorn Technology, Alberta Innovates, Alter Eco Pulp, Alterpacks, AmicaTerra, An Phát Bioplastics, Anellotech Inc., Ankor Bioplastics, ANPOLY Inc., Apeel Sciences, Applied Bioplastics, Aquapak Polymers Ltd, Aquaspersions, Archer Daniel Midland Company, Archipelago Technology Group, Archroma, Arekapak GmbH, Arkema SA, Arrow Greentech, Asahi Kasei Chemicals Corporation, Attis Innovations LLC, Avantium BV, Avani Eco, Avient Corporation, Balrampur Chini Mills, BASF SE, Berry Global, Be Green Packaging LLC, Bioelements Group, Bio Fab NZ, BIO-FED, Biofibre GmbH, Biokemik, BIOLO, BioLogiQ Inc., BIO-LUTIONS International AG, Biomass Resin Holdings, Biome Bioplastics, BIOTEC GmbH, Bio2Coat, Bioform Technologies, Biovox GmbH, Bioplastech Ltd, BioSmart Nano, BlockTexx Pty Ltd, Blue Ocean Closures, Bluepha Beijing Lanjing, BOBST, Borealis AG, Borregaard Chemcell, Brightplus Oy, Buhl Paperform GmbH, Business Innovation Partners, CapaTec Inc, Carbiolice, Carbios, Cass Materials Pty Ltd, Cardia Bioplastics Ltd, CARAPAC Company, Celanese Corporation, Cellugy, Cellutech AB, Celwise AB, Chemol Company, Chemkey Advanced Materials, Chinova Bioworks, Cirkla, CJ Biomaterials Inc., CKF Inc, Coastgrass ApS, Constantia Flexibles, Corumat Inc., Cruz Foam, CuanTec Ltd, Cullen Eco-Friendly Packaging, Daicel Polymer Ltd, Daio Paper Corporation, Danimer Scientific LLC, DIC Corporation, DIC Products Inc., DisSolves, DKS Co. Ltd, Dow Inc., DuFor Resins BV, DuPont, E6PR, EarthForm, Earthodic Pty Ltd, Eastman Chemical Company, Ecologic Brands Inc., Ecomann Biotechnology, Eco-Products Inc., Eco-SQ, Ecoshell, EcoSynthetix Inc., Ecovative Design LLC, Ecovia Renewables, Enkev, E-molding International, EnviroPAK Corporation, Epoch Biodesign, Eranova, Esbottle Oy, Evoware, Fiberlean Technologies, Fiberpac, Fiberwood Oy, Fibercel Packaging LLC, Fibmold, Fiorini International, FKuR Kunststoff GmbH, FlexSea, Floreon, Follmann GmbH, Foodberry, Footprint, Forest and Whale and more.......

 

 

 

 

1             EXECUTIVE SUMMARY            31

  • 1.1        Global Packaging Market       31
  • 1.2        What is sustainable packaging?       32
  • 1.3        The Global Market for Sustainable Packaging          34
    • 1.3.1    By packaging materials           34
      • 1.3.1.1 Tonnes                34
      • 1.3.1.2 Revenues          35
    • 1.3.2    By packaging product type    37
      • 1.3.2.1 Tonnes                37
      • 1.3.2.2 Revenues          37
    • 1.3.3    By end-use market     38
      • 1.3.3.1 Tonnes                39
      • 1.3.3.2 Revenues          39
    • 1.3.4    By region           41
      • 1.3.4.1 Tonnes                41
      • 1.3.4.2 Revenues          42
  • 1.4        Main types       42
    • 1.4.1    Cellulose acetate        44
    • 1.4.2    PLA       44
    • 1.4.3    Aliphatic-aromatic co-polyesters     45
    • 1.4.4    PHA      45
    • 1.4.5    Starch/starch blends 45
  • 1.5        Prices  46
  • 1.6        Commercial products              47
  • 1.7        Market Trends                50
  • 1.8        Market Drivers for recent growth in Sustainable Packaging            51
  • 1.9        Challenges for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging         52

 

2             INTRODUCTION          54

  • 2.1        Market overview           55
  • 2.2        Types of sustainable packaging materials  55
    • 2.2.1    Biodegradable and Compostable Materials              56
      • 2.2.1.1 PLA (Polylactic Acid) 56
      • 2.2.1.2 Bagasse            56
      • 2.2.1.3 Mushroom Packaging              58
      • 2.2.1.4 Seaweed-Based Materials    59
    • 2.2.2    Paper and Fiber-Based Materials      61
      • 2.2.2.1 Recycled Paper/Cardboard  61
      • 2.2.2.2 Molded Pulp   62
      • 2.2.2.3 Bamboo Packaging   63
    • 2.2.3    Bio-Based Plastics     64
      • 2.2.3.1 Bio-PE and Bio-PET    64
      • 2.2.3.2 PHAs (Polyhydroxyalkanoates)          66
    • 2.2.4    Reusable and Upcycled Materials   67
      • 2.2.4.1 Glass   67
      • 2.2.4.2 Aluminum        68
      • 2.2.4.3 Upcycled Agricultural Waste               70
    • 2.2.5    Other Materials            72
      • 2.2.5.1 Edible Packaging         72
      • 2.2.5.2 Cellulose-Based Films            73
      • 2.2.5.3 Algae-Based Materials             74
    • 2.2.6    Sustainable Barrier Coatings               75
      • 2.2.6.1 Thermoplastic polymer coatings      75
      • 2.2.6.2 High barrier polymer coatings (Green PVOH/EVOH)            76
      • 2.2.6.3 Aluminium barrier coatings  77
      • 2.2.6.4 Wax coatings  78
      • 2.2.6.5 Silicone and natural material coatings          80
      • 2.2.6.6 Biobased barrier polymers    81
    • 2.2.7    Sustainable Packaging Adhesives    81
      • 2.2.7.1 Waterborne adhesives             81
        • 2.2.7.1.1           Acrylic-copolymer adhesives             81
        • 2.2.7.1.2           VAE (vinyl acetate ethylene) adhesives         82
        • 2.2.7.1.3           PVAc (polyvinyl acetate) adhesives 83
        • 2.2.7.1.4           Natural-based adhesives       84
      • 2.2.7.2 Solvent-borne/reactive systems       85
        • 2.2.7.2.1           Acrylic adhesives        85
        • 2.2.7.2.2           Synthetic elastomer adhesives         86
        • 2.2.7.2.3           Polyurethane adhesives         87
      • 2.2.7.3 Hot melt adhesives    87
        • 2.2.7.3.1           EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) hot melts          87
        • 2.2.7.3.2           Polyolefin hot melts   88
        • 2.2.7.3.3           Bio-based hot melts  89
        • 2.2.7.3.4           Polyamide hot melts 90
      • 2.2.7.4 Radiation-curable adhesives              90
        • 2.2.7.4.1           UV-curable systems  90
        • 2.2.7.4.2           Electron beam curable adhesives    91
  • 2.3        Packaging lifecycle     92
    • 2.3.1    Raw materials               93
    • 2.3.2    Manufacturing              94
    • 2.3.3    Transport          95
    • 2.3.4    Packaging in-use         96
    • 2.3.5    End of life         96

 

3             SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS IN PACKAGING  97

  • 3.1        Materials innovation 97
  • 3.2        Active packaging         98
  • 3.3        Monomaterial packaging       98
  • 3.4        Conventional polymer materials used in packaging            98
    • 3.4.1    Polyolefins: Polypropylene and polyethylene            99
      • 3.4.1.1 Overview           99
      • 3.4.1.2 Grades               100
      • 3.4.1.3 Producers         100
    • 3.4.2    PET and other polyester polymers   101
      • 3.4.2.1 Overview           101
    • 3.4.3    Renewable and bio-based polymers for packaging             102
    • 3.4.4    Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers  103
    • 3.4.5    Processes for bioplastics in packaging        104
    • 3.4.6    End-of-life treatment of bio-based and sustainable packaging   105
  • 3.5        Synthetic bio-based packaging materials   106
    • 3.5.1    Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA)        106
      • 3.5.1.1 Overview           106
      • 3.5.1.2 Properties         107
      • 3.5.1.3 Applications   107
      • 3.5.1.4 Advantages     108
      • 3.5.1.5 Challenges      108
      • 3.5.1.6 Commercial examples            109
    • 3.5.2    Polyethylene terephthalate (Bio-PET)            109
      • 3.5.2.1 Overview           109
      • 3.5.2.2 Properties         110
      • 3.5.2.3 Applications   110
      • 3.5.2.4 Advantages of Bio-PET in Packaging              111
      • 3.5.2.5 Challenges and Limitations 111
      • 3.5.2.6 Commercial examples            112
    • 3.5.3    Polytrimethylene terephthalate (Bio-PTT)   112
      • 3.5.3.1 Overview           112
      • 3.5.3.2 Production Process   113
      • 3.5.3.3 Properties         113
      • 3.5.3.4 Applications   113
      • 3.5.3.5 Advantages of Bio-PTT in Packaging               114
      • 3.5.3.6 Challenges and Limitations 114
      • 3.5.3.7 Commercial examples            114
    • 3.5.4    Polyethylene furanoate (Bio-PEF)     115
      • 3.5.4.1 Overview           115
      • 3.5.4.2 Properties         115
      • 3.5.4.3 Applications   115
      • 3.5.4.4 Advantages of Bio-PEF in Packaging              116
      • 3.5.4.5 Challenges and Limitations 116
      • 3.5.4.6 Commercial examples            116
    • 3.5.5    Bio-PA 116
      • 3.5.5.1 Overview           116
      • 3.5.5.2 Properties         117
      • 3.5.5.3 Applications in Packaging     117
      • 3.5.5.4 Advantages of Bio-PA in Packaging 118
      • 3.5.5.5 Challenges and Limitations 118
      • 3.5.5.6 Commercial examples            118
    • 3.5.6    Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (Bio-PBAT)- Aliphatic aromatic copolyesters                118
      • 3.5.6.1 Overview           118
      • 3.5.6.2 Properties         119
      • 3.5.6.3 Applications in Packaging     119
      • 3.5.6.4 Advantages of Bio-PBAT in Packaging           119
      • 3.5.6.5 Challenges and Limitations 120
      • 3.5.6.6 Commercial examples            120
    • 3.5.7    Polybutylene succinate (PBS) and copolymers       120
      • 3.5.7.1 Overview           120
      • 3.5.7.2 Properties         121
      • 3.5.7.3 Applications in Packaging     121
      • 3.5.7.4 Advantages of Bio-PBS and Co-polymers in Packaging     121
      • 3.5.7.5 Challenges and Limitations 122
      • 3.5.7.6 Commercial examples            122
    • 3.5.8    Polypropylene (Bio-PP)            122
      • 3.5.8.1 Overview           122
      • 3.5.8.2 Properties         123
      • 3.5.8.3 Applications in Packaging     123
      • 3.5.8.4 Advantages of Bio-PP in Packaging 123
      • 3.5.8.5 Challenges and Limitations 123
      • 3.5.8.6 Commercial examples            124
  • 3.6        Natural bio-based packaging materials       124
    • 3.6.1    Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)             124
      • 3.6.1.1 Properties         125
      • 3.6.1.2 Applications in Packaging     125
      • 3.6.1.3 Advantages of PHA in Packaging      126
      • 3.6.1.4 Challenges and Limitations 126
      • 3.6.1.5 Commercial examples            127
    • 3.6.2    Starch-based blends 127
      • 3.6.2.1 Overview           127
      • 3.6.2.2 Properties         128
      • 3.6.2.3 Applications in Packaging     128
      • 3.6.2.4 Advantages of Starch-Based Blends in Packaging 128
      • 3.6.2.5 Challenges and Limitations 128
      • 3.6.2.6 Commercial examples            129
    • 3.6.3    Cellulose          129
      • 3.6.3.1 Feedstocks      129
        • 3.6.3.1.1           Wood  129
        • 3.6.3.1.2           Plant    129
        • 3.6.3.1.3           Tunicate             130
        • 3.6.3.1.4           Algae   130
        • 3.6.3.1.5           Bacteria             131
      • 3.6.3.2 Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)        132
        • 3.6.3.2.1           Properties         132
      • 3.6.3.3 Nanocellulose               132
        • 3.6.3.3.1           Cellulose nanocrystals           132
          • 3.6.3.3.1.1      Applications in packaging     133
        • 3.6.3.3.2           Cellulose nanofibers 134
          • 3.6.3.3.2.1      Applications in packaging     135
        • 3.6.3.3.3           Bacterial Nanocellulose (BNC)          140
          • 3.6.3.3.3.1      Applications in packaging     143
      • 3.6.3.4 Commercial examples            144
    • 3.6.4    Protein-based bioplastics in packaging       144
      • 3.6.4.1 Feedstocks      144
      • 3.6.4.2 Commercial examples            146
    • 3.6.5    Lipids and waxes for packaging         146
      • 3.6.5.1 Overview           146
      • 3.6.5.2 Commercial examples            147
    • 3.6.6    Seaweed-based packaging  147
      • 3.6.6.1 Overview           147
      • 3.6.6.2 Production       148
      • 3.6.6.3 Applications in packaging     148
      • 3.6.6.4 Producers         149
    • 3.6.7    Mycelium          149
      • 3.6.7.1 Overview           149
      • 3.6.7.2 Applications in packaging     150
      • 3.6.7.3 Commercial examples            151
    • 3.6.8    Chitosan           151
      • 3.6.8.1 Overview           151
      • 3.6.8.2 Applications in packaging     152
      • 3.6.8.3 Commercial examples            152
    • 3.6.9    Bio-naphtha   153
      • 3.6.9.1 Overview           153
      • 3.6.9.2 Markets and applications      154
      • 3.6.9.3 Commercial examples            155
  • 3.7        Sustainable Barrier Coatings               156
    • 3.7.1    Substrates: Paper and Plastic             156
      • 3.7.1.1 Paper substrate characteristics and coating requirements             156
      • 3.7.1.2 Plastic substrate applications and sustainability challenges        157
      • 3.7.1.3 Substrate selection criteria and performance trade-offs 158
    • 3.7.2    Extrusion Barrier Coatings    158
    • 3.7.3    Thermoplastic Polymers        159
    • 3.7.4    Aluminium       160
    • 3.7.5    Waxes 161
    • 3.7.6    Silicone and Other Natural Materials             162
    • 3.7.7    High Barrier Polymers              162
    • 3.7.8    Wet-Barrier Coatings 163
      • 3.7.8.1 Application methods and process optimization     163
      • 3.7.8.2 Performance benchmarking against alternatives  164
      • 3.7.8.3 Environmental impact assessment 164
      • 3.7.8.4 Market adoption patterns      165
    • 3.7.9    Wax Coating   165
    • 3.7.10 Barrier Metallisation 169
      • 3.7.10.1            Technology overview and application scope             169
      • 3.7.10.2            Performance advantages in barrier applications   169
      • 3.7.10.3            Sustainability challenges and recycling impact      170
    • 3.7.11 Biodegradable, biobased and recyclable coatings                171
    • 3.7.12 Monolayer Coatings  176
    • 3.7.13 Current Technology State-of-the-Art               176
      • 3.7.13.1            Water-based coating technologies  176
      • 3.7.13.2            Bio-based polymer solutions              178
        • 3.7.13.2.1        Polysaccharides          180
          • 3.7.13.2.1.1   Chitin  181
          • 3.7.13.2.1.2   Chitosan           181
          • 3.7.13.2.1.3   Starch 181
        • 3.7.13.2.2        Poly(lactic acid) (PLA)              181
        • 3.7.13.2.3        Poly(butylene Succinate         182
        • 3.7.13.2.4        Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)             182
        • 3.7.13.2.5        Alginate              183
        • 3.7.13.2.6        Cellulose Acetate        184
        • 3.7.13.2.7        Protein-Based (Soy, Wheat)  184
        • 3.7.13.2.8        Bio-PE (Polyethylene)               185
        • 3.7.13.2.9        Bio-PET              186
        • 3.7.13.2.10     Lignin-Based Polymers            186
        • 3.7.13.2.11     Bacterial Cellulose     187
        • 3.7.13.2.12     Furan-Based Polymers (PEF)               187
        • 3.7.13.2.13     Tannin-Based Polymers          188
      • 3.7.13.3            Dispersion Coating Systems               189
      • 3.7.13.4            Nano-enhanced Barrier Materials   190
  • 3.8        Sustainable Adhesive Technologies                193
    • 3.8.1    Bio-based adhesive raw materials   193
      • 3.8.1.1 Plant-based polyols  193
      • 3.8.1.2 Natural rubber latex   194
      • 3.8.1.3 Soy-based adhesives               195
      • 3.8.1.4 Casein-based adhesives        195
    • 3.8.2    Performance requirements for packaging adhesives          196
      • 3.8.2.1 Bond strength specifications              196
      • 3.8.2.2 Temperature resistance          197
      • 3.8.2.3 Chemical resistance 198
      • 3.8.2.4 Food contact compliance     198
    • 3.8.3    Sustainable adhesive development trends                199
      • 3.8.3.1 Vinyl acetate monomer/ethylene developments    199
      • 3.8.3.2 Acrylate innovations 200
      • 3.8.3.3 Bio-based polyurethane systems     201
      • 3.8.3.4 Recycling-compatible formulations               202

 

4             SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING RECYCLING       203

  • 4.1        Mechanical recycling                204
    • 4.1.1    Closed-loop mechanical recycling  205
    • 4.1.2    Open-loop mechanical recycling      205
    • 4.1.3    Polymer types, use, and recovery     205
  • 4.2        Advanced chemical recycling             206
    • 4.2.1    Main streams of plastic waste            206
    • 4.2.2    Comparison of mechanical and advanced chemical recycling    207
  • 4.3        Capacities       207
  • 4.4        Global polymer demand 2022-2040, segmented by recycling technology            209
  • 4.5        Global market by recycling process 2020-2024, metric tons         210
  • 4.6        Chemically recycled plastic products           211
  • 4.7        Market map    212
  • 4.8        Value chain     214
  • 4.9        Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of advanced plastics recycling processes             215
  • 4.10     Pyrolysis            216
    • 4.10.1 Non-catalytic 216
    • 4.10.2 Catalytic            218
      • 4.10.2.1            Polystyrene pyrolysis 219
      • 4.10.2.2            Pyrolysis for production of bio fuel  220
      • 4.10.2.3            Used tires pyrolysis   223
        • 4.10.2.3.1        Conversion to biofuel               224
      • 4.10.2.4            Co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic wastes             225
    • 4.10.3 SWOT analysis              225
    • 4.10.4 Companies and capacities  226
  • 4.11     Gasification    227
    • 4.11.1 Technology overview 227
      • 4.11.1.1            Syngas conversion to methanol        228
      • 4.11.1.2            Biomass gasification and syngas fermentation       232
      • 4.11.1.3            Biomass gasification and syngas thermochemical conversion    232
    • 4.11.2 SWOT analysis              233
    • 4.11.3 Companies and capacities (current and planned)                233
  • 4.12     Dissolution     234
    • 4.12.1 Technology overview 234
    • 4.12.2 SWOT analysis              235
    • 4.12.3 Companies and capacities (current and planned)                236
  • 4.13     Depolymerisation       237
    • 4.13.1 Hydrolysis        238
      • 4.13.1.1            Technology overview 239
      • 4.13.1.2            SWOT analysis              240
    • 4.13.2 Enzymolysis   240
      • 4.13.2.1            Technology overview 240
      • 4.13.2.2            SWOT analysis              241
    • 4.13.3 Methanolysis 242
      • 4.13.3.1            Technology overview 242
      • 4.13.3.2            SWOT analysis              243
    • 4.13.4 Glycolysis         244
      • 4.13.4.1            Technology overview 244
      • 4.13.4.2            SWOT analysis              245
    • 4.13.5 Aminolysis      246
      • 4.13.5.1            Technology overview 246
      • 4.13.5.2            SWOT analysis              247
    • 4.13.6 Companies and capacities (current and planned)                247
  • 4.14     Other advanced chemical recycling technologies 248
    • 4.14.1 Hydrothermal cracking           248
    • 4.14.2 Pyrolysis with in-line reforming          249
    • 4.14.3 Microwave-assisted pyrolysis             249
    • 4.14.4 Plasma pyrolysis         250
    • 4.14.5 Plasma gasification   251
    • 4.14.6 Supercritical fluids     251
  • 4.15     Recycling challenges for coated materials 253
    • 4.15.1 Material recovery facility (MRF) challenges                253
    • 4.15.2 AI and optical sorting technologies 254
    • 4.15.3 Recycling by design principles           255
      • 4.15.3.1            Mono-material coating approaches               256
  • 4.16     Adhesive Impact on Recyclability     258
    • 4.16.1 Debonding technologies        258
    • 4.16.2 Water-washable adhesive systems 259
    • 4.16.3 Adhesive contamination in recycling streams         259
    • 4.16.4 Design for recycling guidelines          260

 

5             MARKETS AND APPLICATIONS           261

  • 5.1        PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING      261
    • 5.1.1    Market overview           262
    • 5.1.2    Recycled Paper and Cardboard         262
      • 5.1.2.1 Post-consumer recycled (PCR) content paperboard           262
      • 5.1.2.2 Kraft paper made from recycled fibers          264
      • 5.1.2.3 Corrugated cardboard with high recycled content                264
    • 5.1.3    FSC/PEFC Certified Virgin Fibers      265
      • 5.1.3.1 Sustainably managed forest sources             265
      • 5.1.3.2 Chain-of-custody certified materials             266
    • 5.1.4    Alternative Fiber Sources       267
      • 5.1.4.1 Bamboo-based paper and board     267
      • 5.1.4.2 Agricultural waste fibers (wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse)         268
      • 5.1.4.3 Hemp and flax fiber papers  269
    • 5.1.5    Plastic-Free Barrier Papers   270
      • 5.1.5.1 Clay-coated papers   270
      • 5.1.5.2 Silicone-coated papers           271
      • 5.1.5.3 Mineral oil barrier papers       272
    • 5.1.6    Water-Based Coatings and Adhesives           273
      • 5.1.6.1 Replacing plastic laminations with aqueous coatings        273
      • 5.1.6.2 Plant-based adhesives for box construction             273
    • 5.1.7    Global market size and forecast to 2036     275
      • 5.1.7.1 Tonnes                275
      • 5.1.7.2 Revenues          277
  • 5.2        FOOD PACKAGING     279
    • 5.2.1    Films and trays              279
    • 5.2.2    Pouches and bags      280
    • 5.2.3    Textiles and nets          281
    • 5.2.4    Compostable Food Containers         281
      • 5.2.4.1 PLA (polylactic acid) trays and containers 281
      • 5.2.4.2 Bagasse food service items  282
      • 5.2.4.3 Molded fiber clamshells and trays   283
    • 5.2.5    Biodegradable Films and Wraps       284
      • 5.2.5.1 Cellulose-based films             284
      • 5.2.5.2 PLA films for food wrapping 285
      • 5.2.5.3 Starch-based wraps  286
    • 5.2.6    Bio-Based Barrier Materials 287
      • 5.2.6.1 Paper with biopolymer coatings        288
      • 5.2.6.2 Plant-based waxes for moisture resistance               289
      • 5.2.6.3 Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) coatings    290
    • 5.2.7    Reusable Food Packaging Systems 291
    • 5.2.8    Bioadhesives 292
      • 5.2.8.1 Starch 292
      • 5.2.8.2 Cellulose          293
      • 5.2.8.3 Protein-Based               293
    • 5.2.9    Barrier coatings and films     293
      • 5.2.9.1 Polysaccharides          294
        • 5.2.9.1.1           Chitin  294
        • 5.2.9.1.2           Chitosan           294
        • 5.2.9.1.3           Starch 295
      • 5.2.9.2 Poly(lactic acid) (PLA)              295
      • 5.2.9.3 Poly(butylene Succinate)       295
      • 5.2.9.4 Functional Lipid and Proteins Based Coatings        295
    • 5.2.10 Active and Smart Food Packaging   295
      • 5.2.10.1            Active Materials and Packaging Systems    295
      • 5.2.10.2            Intelligent and Smart Food Packaging           296
      • 5.2.10.3            Oxygen scavengers from natural materials 298
      • 5.2.10.4            Antimicrobial packaging from plant extracts            298
      • 5.2.10.5            Bio-based sensors for food freshness           299
    • 5.2.11 Antimicrobial films and agents          301
      • 5.2.11.1            Natural               301
      • 5.2.11.2            Inorganic nanoparticles          302
      • 5.2.11.3            Biopolymers   302
    • 5.2.12 Bio-based Inks and Dyes        302
    • 5.2.13 Edible films and coatings       303
      • 5.2.13.1            Overview           303
      • 5.2.13.2            Commercial examples            304
    • 5.2.14 Types of sustainable coatings and films in packaging        306
      • 5.2.14.1            Polyurethane coatings             306
        • 5.2.14.1.1        Properties         306
        • 5.2.14.1.2        Bio-based polyurethane coatings     307
        • 5.2.14.1.3        Products           308
      • 5.2.14.2            Acrylate resins              308
        • 5.2.14.2.1        Properties         308
        • 5.2.14.2.2        Bio-based acrylates  309
        • 5.2.14.2.3        Products           309
      • 5.2.14.3            Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA)        309
        • 5.2.14.3.1        Properties         311
        • 5.2.14.3.2        Bio-PLA coatings and films  311
      • 5.2.14.4            Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) coatings         312
      • 5.2.14.5            Cellulose coatings and films               313
        • 5.2.14.5.1        Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)        313
        • 5.2.14.5.2        Cellulose nanofibers 313
          • 5.2.14.5.2.1   Properties         314
          • 5.2.14.5.2.2   Product developers    315
      • 5.2.14.6            Lignin coatings              317
      • 5.2.14.7            Protein-based biomaterials for coatings      317
        • 5.2.14.7.1        Plant derived proteins              317
        • 5.2.14.7.2        Animal origin proteins              318
    • 5.2.15 Global market size and forecast to 2036     319
      • 5.2.15.1            Tonnes                319
      • 5.2.15.2            Revenues          320
  • 5.3        FLEXIBLE PACKAGING              322
    • 5.3.1    Market overview           323
    • 5.3.2    Compostable Flexible Films 323
      • 5.3.2.1 PLA film laminates     323
      • 5.3.2.2 PHAs (polyhydroxyalkanoates) films              324
      • 5.3.2.3 PBAT (polybutylene adipate terephthalate) films   325
      • 5.3.2.4 TPS (thermoplastic starch) films      326
    • 5.3.3    Recyclable Mono-Materials 328
      • 5.3.3.1 All-PE (polyethylene) structures        328
      • 5.3.3.2 All-PP (polypropylene) structures     330
      • 5.3.3.3 Designed for mechanical recycling 331
    • 5.3.4    Paper-Based Flexible Packaging       332
      • 5.3.4.1 High-strength paper with functional coatings          332
      • 5.3.4.2 Paper-plastic hybrid structures with separable layers        333
      • 5.3.4.3 Glassine and greaseproof papers    334
    • 5.3.5    Bio-Based Films          335
      • 5.3.5.1 Bio-PE films (from sugarcane)            335
      • 5.3.5.2 Bio-PET films 336
      • 5.3.5.3 Cellulose-based transparent films  337
    • 5.3.6    Reduced Material Structures               338
      • 5.3.6.1 Ultra-thin films with enhanced performance            339
      • 5.3.6.2 Downgauged materials with reinforcing technologies        340
      • 5.3.6.3 Resource-efficient multi-layer structures   341
    • 5.3.7    Global market size and forecast to 2036     342
      • 5.3.7.1 Tonnes                342
      • 5.3.7.2 Revenues          343
  • 5.4        RIGID PACKAGING      345
    • 5.4.1    Market overview           345
    • 5.4.2    Recycled Plastic Containers                345
      • 5.4.2.1 rPET (recycled polyethylene terephthalate) bottles and containers          345
      • 5.4.2.2 rHDPE (recycled high-density polyethylene) bottles            346
      • 5.4.2.3 PCR polypropylene tubs and containers     347
    • 5.4.3    Bio-Based Rigid Plastics        348
      • 5.4.3.1 Bio-PET bottles (partially plant-based)         348
      • 5.4.3.2 Bio-PE containers       349
      • 5.4.3.3 PLA bottles and jars  350
    • 5.4.4    Refillable/Reusable Systems              351
      • 5.4.4.1 Durable containers designed for multiple uses      351
      • 5.4.4.2 Standardized shapes for refill systems         351
      • 5.4.4.3 Concentrated product formats reducing packaging            353
    • 5.4.5    Alternative Materials 354
      • 5.4.5.1 Mushroom packaging for protective applications 354
      • 5.4.5.2 Molded pulp containers and inserts               355
      • 5.4.5.3 Wood and cork containers for premium products 356
    • 5.4.6    Glass and Metal Alternatives               357
      • 5.4.6.1 Lightweight glass technologies          357
      • 5.4.6.2 Thin-walled aluminum containers   359
      • 5.4.6.3 Tin-free steel packaging         360
    • 5.4.7    Global market and forecasts to 2036          361
      • 5.4.7.1 Tonnes                361
      • 5.4.7.2 Revenues          362
  • 5.5        CARBON CAPTURE DERIVED MATERIALS FOR PACKAGING           364
    • 5.5.1    Benefits of carbon utilization for plastics feedstocks         365
    • 5.5.2    CO₂-derived polymers and plastics 367
    • 5.5.3    CO2 utilization products        368
  • 5.6        SUSTAINABLE BARRIER COATINGS 370
    • 5.6.1    Market overview and drivers 370
    • 5.6.2    Coating consumption by substrate type      371
      • 5.6.2.1 Paper substrates         371
      • 5.6.2.2 Plastic substrates       372
    • 5.6.3    Market by coating process    372
      • 5.6.3.1 Extrusion coatings      372
      • 5.6.3.2 Wet-coating applications      373
      • 5.6.3.3 Wax coating processes           374
    • 5.6.4    Market by material type           375
      • 5.6.4.1 Thermoplastic polymer coatings      375
      • 5.6.4.2 High barrier polymer coatings             376
      • 5.6.4.3 Aluminum barrier coatings    377
      • 5.6.4.4 Wax coatings  378
      • 5.6.4.5 Silicone and natural material coatings          379
      • 5.6.4.6 Biobased barrier polymers    380
        • 5.6.4.6.1           PHA coating applications      380
      • 5.6.4.7 Starch-based barrier coatings            380
        • 5.6.4.7.1           Protein-based barrier materials         381
  • 5.7        PACKAGING ADHESIVES        382
    • 5.7.1    Market overview and structure           382
    • 5.7.2    Market drivers and external factors 383
    • 5.7.3    Packaging waste and regulations     384
    • 5.7.4    Market by adhesive    386
      • 5.7.4.1 Waterborne adhesives market            386
        • 5.7.4.1.1           Acrylic-copolymer      386
        • 5.7.4.1.2           VAE adhesives               387
        • 5.7.4.1.3           PVAc adhesives            387
        • 5.7.4.1.4           Natural-based adhesives       388
      • 5.7.4.2 Solvent-borne/reactive systems market      388
        • 5.7.4.2.1           Acrylic systems            389
        • 5.7.4.2.2           Synthetic elastomer systems             390
        • 5.7.4.2.3           Polyurethane systems             391
      • 5.7.4.3 Hot melt adhesives market   391
        • 5.7.4.3.1           EVA hot melts 391
        • 5.7.4.3.2           Polyolefin hot melts   392
        • 5.7.4.3.3           Synthetic elastomer hot melts           392
        • 5.7.4.3.4           Bio-based hot melt developments   393
      • 5.7.4.4 Radiation-curable adhesives              394
    • 5.7.5    Market by packaging type      394
      • 5.7.5.1 Rigid packaging/labels            394
        • 5.7.5.1.1           Corrugated board packaging              394
        • 5.7.5.1.2           Paperboard applications       395
        • 5.7.5.1.3           Carton assembly         396
        • 5.7.5.1.4           Core manufacturing 396
        • 5.7.5.1.5           Composite cans/containers 397
        • 5.7.5.1.6           Rigid plastic containers          398
        • 5.7.5.1.7           Labels and lidding      398
      • 5.7.5.2 Flexible packaging     399
        • 5.7.5.2.1           Multilayer structure lamination         399
        • 5.7.5.2.2           Seal layer applications            400
        • 5.7.5.2.3           Adhesive lamination processes         401
        • 5.7.5.2.4           Heat sealing applications      401

 

6             COMPANY PROFILES                403 (318 company profiles)

 

7             RESEARCH METHODOLOGY              658

 

8             REFERENCES 659

 

List of Tables

  • Table 1. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging materials, 2023-2036 (1,000 tonnes).   34
  • Table 2. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging materials, 2023-2036 (Millions USD).    35
  • Table 3. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging product type, 2023-2036 (1,000 tonnes).                37
  • Table 4. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging product type, 2023-2036 (Millions USD).                38
  • Table 5. Global sustainable packaging market by end-use market, 2023-2036(1,000 tonnes).             39
  • Table 6. Global sustainable packaging market by end-use market, 2023-2036 (Millions USD).             40
  • Table 7. Global sustainable packaging market by region, 2023-2036 (1,000 tonnes).   41
  • Table 8. Global sustainable packaging market by region, 2023-2036 (Millions USD).   42
  • Table 9. Main Types of Sustainable Packaging Materials   43
  • Table 10. Average prices by packaging type, 2024 (US$ per kg).   46
  • Table 11. Average annual prices by bioplastic type, 2020-2023 (US$ per kg).     46
  • Table 12. Recent sustainable packaging products.              47
  • Table 13. Market trends in Sustainable Packaging 50
  • Table 14. Market drivers for recent growth in the Sustainable Packaging market.            51
  • Table 15. Challenges for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging.  52
  • Table 16. Types of bio-based plastics and fossil-fuel-based plastics       98
  • Table 17. Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers.           104
  • Table 18. Processes for bioplastics in packaging. 105
  • Table 19. LDPE film versus PLA, 2019–24 (USD/tonne).    106
  • Table 20. PLA properties for packaging applications.         107
  • Table 21. Applications, advantages and disadvantages of PHAs in packaging. 125
  • Table 22. Major polymers found in the extracellular covering of different algae.               130
  • Table 23. Market overview for cellulose microfibers (microfibrillated cellulose) in paperboard and packaging-market age, key benefits, applications and producers.            132
  • Table 24. Applications of nanocrystalline cellulose (CNC).            133
  • Table 25. Market overview for cellulose nanofibers in packaging.              135
  • Table 26. Applications of Bacterial Nanocellulose in Packaging. 143
  • Table 27. Types of protein based-bioplastics, applications and companies.      145
  • Table 28. Overview of alginate-description, properties, application and market size.   147
  • Table 29. Companies developing algal-based bioplastics.             149
  • Table 30. Overview of mycelium fibers-description, properties, drawbacks and applications.               149
  • Table 31. Overview of chitosan-description, properties, drawbacks and applications.                151
  • Table 32. Commercial Examples of Chitosan-based Films and Coatings and Companies.      152
  • Table 33. Bio-based naphtha markets and applications. 154
  • Table 34. Bio-naphtha market value chain.               155
  • Table 35. Commercial Examples of Bio-Naphtha Packaging and Companies.  155
  • Table 36. Paper substrate characteristics and coating requirements.      157
  • Table 37. Plastic substrate applications and sustainability challenges. 157
  • Table 38. Substrate selection criteria and performance trade-offs.          158
  • Table 39. Wet-Barrier Coatings Application methods and process optimization.             163
  • Table 40. Wet-Barrier Coatings Performance benchmarking against alternatives.          164
  • Table 41.Wet-Barrier Coatings Environmental Impact Assessment          164
  • Table 42. Wax Coating Sustainability Credentials and Limitations.           166
  • Table 43. Wax Coating Sustainability credentials and limitations.             167
  • Table 44. Types of biobased coatings materials.    173
  • Table 45. Water-based coating technologies.           177
  • Table 46. Global bioplastics capacities by Material Type ('000 tonnes). 178
  • Table 47. Bio-based polymer solutions.       180
  • Table 48. Dispersion coating systems.         189
  • Table 49. Nano-enhanced barrier materials.            191
  • Table 50. Overview of the recycling technologies. 204
  • Table 51. Polymer types, use, and recovery.              205
  • Table 52. Composition of plastic waste streams.  206
  • Table 53. Comparison of mechanical and advanced chemical recycling.             207
  • Table 54. Advanced plastics recycling capacities, by technology.              207
  • Table 55. Example chemically recycled plastic products.                212
  • Table 56. Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of Advanced Chemical Recycling Processes. 215
  • Table 57. Summary of non-catalytic pyrolysis technologies.         217
  • Table 58. Summary of catalytic pyrolysis technologies.    218
  • Table 59. Summary of pyrolysis technique under different operating conditions.            221
  • Table 60. Biomass materials and their bio-oil yield.             222
  • Table 61. Biofuel production cost from the biomass pyrolysis process. 222
  • Table 62. Pyrolysis companies and plant capacities, current and planned.         226
  • Table 63. Summary of gasification technologies.  227
  • Table 64. Advanced recycling (Gasification) companies. 233
  • Table 65. Summary of dissolution technologies.   234
  • Table 66. Advanced recycling (Dissolution) companies    236
  • Table 67. Depolymerisation processes for PET, PU, PC and PA, products and yields.    238
  • Table 68. Summary of hydrolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers.           239
  • Table 69. Summary of Enzymolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 240
  • Table 70. Summary of methanolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 242
  • Table 71. Summary of glycolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers.           244
  • Table 72. Summary of aminolysis technologies.    246
  • Table 73. Advanced recycling (Depolymerisation) companies and capacities (current and planned).                247
  • Table 74. Overview of hydrothermal cracking for advanced chemical recycling.              248
  • Table 75. Overview of Pyrolysis with in-line reforming for advanced chemical recycling.            249
  • Table 76. Overview of microwave-assisted pyrolysis for advanced chemical recycling.              249
  • Table 77. Overview of plasma pyrolysis for advanced chemical recycling.           250
  • Table 78. Overview of plasma gasification for advanced chemical recycling.     251
  • Table 79. Mono-material coating approaches.        256
  • Table 80. The global market for sustainable paper & board packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (‘000 tonnes).             275
  • Table 81. The global market for sustainable paper & board packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD).              277
  • Table 82. Pros and cons of different type of food packaging materials.   279
  • Table 83. Active Biodegradable Films films and their food applications.               296
  • Table 84. Intelligent Biodegradable Films.  297
  • Table 85. Edible films and coatings market summary.       303
  • Table 86. Types of polyols.    306
  • Table 87. Polyol producers.  307
  • Table 88. Bio-based polyurethane coating products.          308
  • Table 89. Bio-based acrylate resin products.           309
  • Table 90. Polylactic acid (PLA) market analysis.    310
  • Table 91. Commercially available PHAs.     312
  • Table 92. Market overview for cellulose nanofibers in paints and coatings.         314
  • Table 93. Companies developing cellulose nanofibers products in paints and coatings.           315
  • Table 94. Types of protein based-biomaterials, applications and companies.   318
  • Table 95. The global market for sustainable food packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (‘000 tonnes).                319
  • Table 96. The global market for sustainable food packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD).                320
  • Table 97. Comparison of bioplastics’ (PLA and PHAs) properties to other common polymers used in product packaging.   327
  • Table 98. Typical applications for bioplastics in flexible packaging.         327
  • Table 99. The global market for sustainable flexible packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (‘000 tonnes).             342
  • Table 100. The global market for sustainable flexible packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD).  343
  • Table 101. Typical applications for bioplastics in rigid packaging.             350
  • Table 102. The global market for sustainable rigid packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (‘000 tonnes).                361
  • Table 103. The global market for sustainable rigid packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD).  362
  • Table 104. CO2 utilization and removal pathways.                365
  • Table 105. CO2 utilization products developed by chemical and plastic producers.     368
  • Table 106. Lactips plastic pellets.    543
  • Table 107. Oji Holdings CNF products.         579

 

List of Figures

  • Figure 1. Global packaging market by material type.           32
  • Figure 2. Unilever’s Magnum ice cream tub using 100% chemically recycled PP .           32
  • Figure 3. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging materials, 2023-2036 (1,000 tonnes). 35
  • Figure 4. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging materials, 2023-2036 (Millions USD).  36
  • Figure 5. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging product type, 2023-2036 (1,000 tonnes).                37
  • Figure 6. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging product type, 2023-2036 (Millions USD).                38
  • Figure 7. Global sustainable packaging market by end-use market, 2023-2036 (1,000 tonnes).           39
  • Figure 8. Global sustainable packaging market by end-use market, 2023-2036 (Millions USD).            40
  • Figure 9. Global sustainable packaging market by region, 2023-2036 (1,000 tonnes). 41
  • Figure 10. Global sustainable packaging market by region, 2023-2036 (Millions USD).               42
  • Figure 11. Packaging lifecycle .          92
  • Figure 12. Routes for synthesizing polymers from fossil-based and bio-based resources.        103
  • Figure 13. Organization and morphology of cellulose synthesizing terminal complexes (TCs) in different organisms.      129
  • Figure 14. Biosynthesis of (a) wood cellulose (b) tunicate cellulose and (c) BC.               130
  • Figure 15. Cellulose microfibrils and nanofibrils.  131
  • Figure 16. TEM image of cellulose nanocrystals.   133
  • Figure 17. CNC slurry.              133
  • Figure 18. CNF gel.     134
  • Figure 19. Bacterial nanocellulose shapes 142
  • Figure 20. BLOOM masterbatch from Algix.               148
  • Figure 21. Typical structure of mycelium-based foam.      150
  • Figure 22. Life cycle of biopolymer packaging materials.. 171
  • Figure 23. Current management systems for waste plastics.        203
  • Figure 24. Global polymer demand 2022-2040, segmented by technology, million metric tons.           210
  • Figure 25. Global demand by recycling process, 2020-2040, million metric tons.           211
  • Figure 26. Market map for advanced recycling.       213
  • Figure 27. Value chain for advanced plastics recycling market.   214
  • Figure 28. Schematic layout of a pyrolysis plant.   216
  • Figure 29. Waste plastic production pathways to (A) diesel and (B) gasoline      220
  • Figure 30. Schematic for Pyrolysis of Scrap Tires. 224
  • Figure 31. Used tires conversion process.  225
  • Figure 32. SWOT analysis-pyrolysis for advanced recycling.          225
  • Figure 33. Total syngas market by product in MM Nm³/h of Syngas          229
  • Figure 34. Overview of biogas utilization.    230
  • Figure 35. Biogas and biomethane pathways.          231
  • Figure 36. SWOT analysis-gasification for advanced recycling.    233
  • Figure 37. SWOT analysis-dissoluton for advanced recycling.      236
  • Figure 38. Products obtained through the different solvolysis pathways of PET, PU, and PA.    237
  • Figure 39. SWOT analysis-Hydrolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 240
  • Figure 40. SWOT analysis-Enzymolysis for advanced chemical recycling.            241
  • Figure 41. SWOT analysis-Methanolysis for advanced chemical recycling.          243
  • Figure 42. SWOT analysis-Glycolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 245
  • Figure 43. Mondelez confectionery packaging using chemically recycled PCR .               246
  • Figure 44. SWOT analysis-Aminolysis for advanced chemical recycling.               247
  • Figure 45. Kit Kat packaged in paper flow wrap .     267
  • Figure 46. Quality Street paper-based chocolate packaging .       270
  • Figure 47. Smarties paper-based chocolate packaging .  270
  • Figure 48. The global market for sustainable paper & board packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (‘000 tonnes).             277
  • Figure 49. The global market for sustainable paper & board packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD).              279
  • Figure 50. Chemically recycled PCR (up to 30%) for Hetbahn plastic tubs .         284
  • Figure 51. Types of bio-based materials used for antimicrobial food packaging application.  301
  • Figure 52. Water soluble packaging by Notpla.        305
  • Figure 53. Examples of edible films in food packaging.     306
  • Figure 54. Hefcel-coated wood (left) and untreated wood (right) after 30 seconds flame test.               317
  • Figure 55. The global market for sustainable food packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (‘000 tonnes).                320
  • Figure 56. The global market for sustainable food packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD).                322
  • Figure 57. Twinings mono-material standup pouches        328
  • Figure 58. Rezorce mono-material PP carton lifecycle.      329
  • Figure 59. Haleon mono-material blister packaging development.           329
  • Figure 60. DRS system for Hetbahn bowls .               332
  • Figure 61. The global market for sustainable flexible packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (‘000 tonnes).             343
  • Figure 62. The global market for sustainable flexible packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD).  345
  • Figure 63. The global market for sustainable rigid packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (‘000 tonnes).                362
  • Figure 64. The global market for sustainable rigid packaging by material type, 2019–2036 (Millions USD).                363
  • Figure 65. Applications for CO2.       365
  • Figure 66. Life cycle of CO2-derived products and services.          367
  • Figure 67.  Conversion pathways for CO2-derived polymeric materials  368
  • Figure 68. Pluumo.     408
  • Figure 69. Anpoly cellulose nanofiber hydrogel.     417
  • Figure 70. MEDICELLU™.         418
  • Figure 71. Asahi Kasei CNF fabric sheet.     427
  • Figure 72. Properties of Asahi Kasei cellulose nanofiber nonwoven fabric.          428
  • Figure 73. CNF nonwoven fabric.      429
  • Figure 74. Passionfruit wrapped in Xgo Circular packaging.           434
  • Figure 75. Be Green Packaging molded fiber products.     435
  • Figure 76. Beyond Meat Molded Fiber Sausage Tray.            436
  • Figure 77. BIOLO e-commerce mailer bag made from PHA.           441
  • Figure 78. Reusable and recyclable foodservice cups, lids, and straws from Joinease Hong Kong Ltd., made with plant-based NuPlastiQ BioPolymer from BioLogiQ, Inc.          442
  • Figure 79. Fiber-based screw cap.   450
  • Figure 80. Molded fiber trays for contact lenses.   454
  • Figure 81. SEELCAP ONEGO.              457
  • Figure 82. CJ CheilJedang's biodegradable PHA-based wrapper for shipping products.              466
  • Figure 83. CuanSave film.     471
  • Figure 84. Cullen Eco-Friendly Packaging beerGUARD molded fiber trays.          472
  • Figure 85. ELLEX products.   474
  • Figure 86. CNF-reinforced PP compounds.               475
  • Figure 87. Kirekira! toilet wipes.         475
  • Figure 88. Edible packaging from Dissolves.             479
  • Figure 89. Rheocrysta spray.                480
  • Figure 90. DKS CNF products.            480
  • Figure 91. Molded fiber plastic rings.             484
  • Figure 92. Mushroom leather.              491
  • Figure 93. Evoware edible seaweed-based packaging       497
  • Figure 94. Photograph (a) and micrograph (b) of mineral/ MFC composite showing the high viscosity and fibrillar structure.        498
  • Figure 95. Forest and Whale container.        507
  • Figure 96. PHA production process.               509
  • Figure 97. Soy Silvestre’s wheatgrass shots.             510
  • Figure 98. Genera molded fiber meat trays.               513
  • Figure 99. AVAPTM process. 516
  • Figure 100. GreenPower+™ process.               517
  • Figure 101. Cutlery samples (spoon, knife, fork) made of nano cellulose and biodegradable plastic composite materials.               521
  • Figure 102. CNF gel.  523
  • Figure 103. Block nanocellulose material. 523
  • Figure 104. CNF products developed by Hokuetsu.             524
  • Figure 105. Unilever Carte D’Or ice cream packaging.       526
  • Figure 106. Kami Shoji CNF products.           533
  • Figure 107. Matrix Pack molded-fiber beverage cup lid.    552
  • Figure 108. Molded fiber Labeling applied to products.     553
  • Figure 109. IPA synthesis method.   560
  • Figure 110. Compostable water pod.             574
  • Figure 111. Coca-cola paper bottle prototype.        585
  • Figure 112. Papierfabrik Meldorf’s grass-based packaging materials .    586
  • Figure 113. PulPac dry molded fiber packaging for cosmetics.     596
  • Figure 114. Example of Qwarzo grease barrier coating.     598
  • Figure 115. XCNF.       601
  • Figure 116: Innventia AB movable nanocellulose demo plant.     602
  • Figure 117. Molded fiber tray.              604
  • Figure 118. Shellworks packaging containers.         612
  • Figure 119. Thales packaging incorporating Fibrease.        621
  • Figure 120. Molded pulp bottles.      621
  • Figure 121. Sulapac cosmetics containers.              623
  • Figure 122.  Sulzer equipment for PLA polymerization processing.            624
  • Figure 123. Molded fiber laundry detergent bottle.               628
  • Figure 124. Tanbark’s clamshell product.   629
  • Figure 125. Silver / CNF composite dispersions.   636
  • Figure 126. CNF/nanosilver powder.               636
  • Figure 127. Corbion FDCA production process.     638
  • Figure 128. UFP Technologies, Inc. product examples.      641
  • Figure 129. UPM biorefinery process.            643
  • Figure 130. Varden coffee pod.          646
  • Figure 131. Vegea production process.        647
  • Figure 132. Worn Again products.    650
  • Figure 133. npulp packaging.              651
  • Figure 134. Western Pulp Products corner protectors.       652
  • Figure 135. S-CNF in powder form. 655

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Global Sustainable Packaging Materials Market 2026-2036
The Global Sustainable Packaging Materials Market 2026-2036
PDF download/by email.

The Global Sustainable Packaging Materials Market 2026-2036
The Global Sustainable Packaging Materials Market 2026-2036
PDF and Print Edition (including tracked delivery).

Payment methods: Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Paypal, Bank Transfer. To order by Bank Transfer (Invoice) select this option from the payment methods menu after adding to cart, or contact info@futuremarketsinc.com